What would have become of Superman if he had been found by a Tea Party couple?

Someone with a sense of compassion Published:

Boom.

Want to leave your comments?

Sign in or Register to comment.

  • God gave you a mouth and I think a brain...but I see he didn't give you enough blood but to run one at a time.

  • because they can't even pass one of their "own bills". LOL !! 

    That would be Harry Reid and you fellow Dumercrats in the Senate. The House has passed many, mant bills to only be left on Ol' Harry's desk to gather dust. That's what you get when you refuse to compromise but support terrorists and terrorism like Barry does...

    Now go check that out sweetie, if you can use the Internet for anything other than coming here and trying to appear intelligent. 

    You kinda fit in with what robert1 says about Homo, I mean brunouno. 

  • As stated on another board...

    "BrunoUno hateth communal religion. He hates white supremacy. He hates sexism (whatever that means). He hates treating loathsome pervs as they justly deserve.... The list could go on. Don’t let him give you his, ‘I love and respect everyone’ rubbish. He respects and loves… anyone who holds exactly the same values as he does. He loves himself. Often. From what I understand.

    I may be a hater, but BrunoUno—a person (?) replete with information (occasionally useful) but bereft of thought—is a self-absorbed hypocrite."

  • PFP...you are correct ..they are never going to pass anything that has the president's ideas behind it.....because they can't even pass one of their "own bills". LOL !! They are all on "CRUZ" control. Bruno you pegged this one correct..."HATROIT". Hate is all he knows.

  • Only irrelevance happening here is your failure to admit failure. You're frivolous attempts to make the messiah appear anything other than an absolute idiot make for good comical reading. Then either by choice or design you post some of the most ridiculous information trying to make this messiah of your party appear intelligent. There ain't enough ginkgo bola in the world to help that dip stick form any sort of cognitive function let alone become intelligent.

    My talents are numerous but even an average individual can see right through your so called informed information with a simple Internet search. Doesn't take much skill to make a donkey's a$$ out of you, you just make it fun and easier to do that's my enjoyment.

    Splitting hairs is what you call being SERVED then call it that if it makes it easier to swallow for you otherwise just remember each and everytime you want to post BS about your messiah there will be someone who posts the TRUTH. I know that's painful for you to accept but not every single American is as gullible as Liberals are. Or if you prefer the street slang for gullible I can always call you a sucka...lmao


  • splitting hairs - Trivial objections is an informal logical fallacy where irrelevant and sometimes frivolous objections are made to divert the attention away from the topic that is being discussed. This type of argument is called a "quibble" or "quillet". Trivial objections are a special case of red herring. 

    Aren't you talented?

  • de·port  verb \di-ˈpȯrt, dē-\

    : to force (a person who is not a citizen) to leave a country

    Look I can do that too:

    Flim Flam

    verb \bullsh!tter\con artist\Community Organizer\deceiver

    swindle (someone or all) with a confidence game.

    OH what comes to mind???? I know... HOPE AND CHANGE, ACA, ECONOMY,TRANSPARENCY, HONESTY, LEADERSHIP, UNITY, RESPONSIBILITY,

    You can post definitions all day long still doesn't help you being right. Just shows you got SERVED....AGAIN.....By a red neck cracka that you think hasn't the ability to be so smert....lmao

    de·port  verb \di-ˈpȯrt, dē-\

    : to force (a person who is not a citizen) to leave a country

    SO are you going to leave willingly or is it going to get ugly?

  • de·port  verb \di-ˈpȯrt, dē-\

    : to force (a person who is not a citizen) to leave a country

  •  

    The Obama administration has sought to portray its performance on immigration enforcement as smarter, better, and more successful than previous administrations. To support this claim, it has presented a few statistical nuggets in clever packaging that have been artificially padded by transferring cases from the Border Patrol to ICE. To use the proverbial “apples and oranges” analogy, the Obama administration, in order to give the impression of a “record” apple harvest, has counted both apples (ICE cases) and oranges painted to look like apples (Border Patrol cases), while leaving a large number of actual apples on the trees.

    A better picture of the true state of immigration enforcement in the interior, where most illegal aliens have settled and where most Americans notice the impact, emerges from this analysis of ICE’s internal statistics and metrics. Interior enforcement activity, including arrests and removals of criminal aliens, which are ICE’s highest priority, has declined significantly. More than 870,000 aliens who have been ordered removed are still living here in defiance of our laws. This dysfunction must be addressed before consideration of more mass amnesties or expansions in admissions of any kind. Until we achieve better control of illegal immigration, and the laws we have are taken seriously and enforced, there is no point in passing new ones

    http://cis.org/ICE-Illegal-Immigrant-Deportations

    Homo says OH NO!!!!!!! The truth is out...

     

  • Total deportations in 2011, the latest year for which complete numbers are available, numbered 715,495 – the lowest level since 1973. The highest number of deportations on record was in 2000, under the Clinton administration, when 1,864,343 aliens were deported.

    When claiming record levels of enforcement, the Obama administration appears to count only removals, which are just one form of deportation, and only a partial measure of enforcement. Beginning in 2011, a shift of some of the routine Border Patrol case load to ICE enabled the administration to count an artificially high number of removals.

    ICE is doing less enforcement with more resources. Despite reporting more encounters in 2013 than 2012, ICE agents pursued deportation of 20 percent fewer aliens this year than last.

    Enforcement activity declined in every ICE field office from 2011 to 2013, with the biggest declines in the Atlanta, Salt Lake City, Washington DC/Virginia, and Houston field offices

    Criminal alien arrests declined by 11 percent from 2012 to 2013, despite the completion of the Secure Communities program, which generates more referrals of arrested aliens than ever before. ICE agents took a pass on hundreds of thousands of aliens who were arrested by local authorities in those years.

    ICE is carrying a case load of 1.8 million aliens who are either in removal proceedings or have already been ordered removed. Less than two percent are in detention, which is the only proven way to ensure departure.

    As of the end of July 2013 there were 872,000 aliens – nearly half of ICE’s total docket – who had been ordered removed but who had not left the country.

    The State Department continues to issue tens of thousands of visas annually to citizens of countries that refuse to take back their countrymen who are ordered removed from the United States. Many of these are violent criminals.

    To support the claim of “record” deportations in 2012, the Obama administration and its supporters cite the 409,000 deportations attributed to ICE that year. This is the highest number of removals credited to ICE in a single year; however, the number is higher because it includes the largest number of Border Patrol cases that ever have been transferred to ICE for processing in a single year (see Table 3). It does not reflect an increase in enforcement activity. In past years, these cases would have been handled by the Border Patrol, and counted in total deportations, but not as removals. Removals are at best half the number of total deportations, and do not represent the entire scope of enforcement actions taken by DHS enforcement agencies.

     

    The President himself confirmed this statistical manipulation in 2011, speaking at a roundtable for Hispanic reporters:

    “The statistics are actually a little deceptive because what we’ve been doing is, with the stronger border enforcement, we’ve been apprehending folks at the borders and sending them back. That is counted as a deportation, even though they may have only been held for a day or 48 hours, sent back — that’s counted as a deportation.” he said.

    Homo says WHAT?

    You act like there is nothing being done to control the influx of undocumented people into this country!  Obama has deported 2 million since his term began.  TWO MILLION! 

    Homo wrong.. AGAIN... GAWD this is getting fun debunking Homo, Legion, Bruno....

  • Spoken like true Hatriots!

  • More hate-filled, confused and empty rhetoric

    Well opinions are like a$$ holes everybody has one. The exception of yours is it is bigger and puts out more stink.

  • Maybe Barrack can get around to deporting himself, and make it TWO MILLION AND ONE!

  • need4speed, July 30, 2014 9:34AM

    "Bruno, as you can probably guess, Horsey tend to ber a bit more to left than I am. In this case we do need to do something to control the influx of undocumented unsponsored ILLEGAL imigrants streaming across our border."

    You act like there is nothing being done to control the influx of undocumented people into this country!  Obama has deported 2 million since his term began.  TWO MILLION!  

    READ!

    "According to Fox News, and pretty much any conservative you run across, President Obama has refused to enforce our immigration laws which has led to a record number of illegal immigrants rushing to our borders. Of course that statement sounds troubling, and it would be except the facts simply don’t support it.

    Currently, President Obama is on pace to deport more illegal immigrants than any president in United States history.  I’m still waiting for someone to explain to me, how is he “soft on illegal immigration” while simultaneously deporting more undocumented immigrants than any other president before him? 

    That brings us to the notion that Obama’s policies have led to a record number of illegal immigrants flooding our borders. Another right-wing talking point that’s completely untrue. In fact, on average, we’re seeing over 600,000 fewer attempts per year by illegal immigrants trying to cross our border under President Obama than we saw under Ronald Reagan. According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, during Reagan’s eight years we saw an average of 1,056,500 illegal immigrants try to cross our border every year.  Under President Obama, that number is down to 417,000. And I know some Republicans will say, “Well, it’s because Obama isn’t enforcing our laws.  Reagan did.  That’s why Reagan caught more.”  That’s nonsense.  You could only use that argument if Obama’s deportation numbers were low as well.  But being that he’s on pace to deport more undocumented immigrants than any other president, it’s preposterous to claim that he’s not enforcing the law at the border yet somehow managing to deport more that are already here than any other president." 

    - See more at: http://www.forwardprogressives.com/proof-illegal-immigration-worse-ronald-reagan-president-obama/#sthash.esmhmXxJ.dpuf

  • More hate-filled, confused and empty rhetoric.

  • I don't agree with everything Bruno says on here and I'm sure they don't agree with me on a lot too, but he has you beat all to **** when it comes to common sense and compassion

    I've never know Socialist or Marxist or Liberals for that matter to have a constructive thought much less feelings of compassion. I'm not going to defend what I believe, or where I stand in a debate against a rock headed Liberal like you ukfan, there's no money in it.

    You carry on your fruit loop liberal life as you see best, but next time you're put into your place and are shown that you are wrong at least use your old mans bawls that you carry around in your purse to admit you were wrong. If you didn't catch that it means show some bawls and man up to being wrong.

    I would be quite willing to take these "refugees" in, even accord them benefits, so long as they didn't obtain voting rights and especially not citizenship.

    That's a good idea, but it won't fly as long as you have Democrats that use these refugees as political stumps to get elected. Since all Legal Americans have to have a Social Security card it might be better to have photos put on them that way this whole business of having to show ID to vote will be put to rest.

  • robert1, my commendations on your ability to express your feelings sans hostility.

  • I do not suggest that Christian values stop anywhere.  My point is that I believe your characterization that these to be Christian values is in error.  And I don't "expect" anyone to take in refugees, anywhere, necessarily.

    I would be quite willing to take these "refugees" in, even accord them benefits, so long as they didn't obtain voting rights and especially not citizenship.

    "Isn't that what our fore-fathers were looking for,a better way of life when they "invaded" America?"

    This is my point exactly.  I am pretty sure if I were a Mohawk or a Cherokee in the 17th and 18th centuries that I would take a pretty dim view of European "immigration."

  • You can call me whatever name you want but Christian values do not stop at the borders of Northern America.

    We expect other countries to accept refugees from other countries when there is a crisis going on in those refugees homes. How are we any different? We are not.

    How can anyone say that these children are invading our country? They are just trying to escape to a place that they feel will give them a safe haven. Isn't that what our fore-fathers were looking for,a better way of life when they "invaded" America?

  • What rubbish.

    This is Marxist thinking at its finest.  It is akin to using Les Miserables' Jean Valjean story (pursued for years by the police for stealing on piece of bread to feed his family), to argue for the abolishment  of property.

    Does the country belong to its citizenry or does it not?  If it does, then the citizenry has a moral right (obligation?) to preserve it from invasion, however one puts the face upon it.

    Christian values do not include one world Humanity.  Nonetheless, it is true that these children are Christians so there is a duty to them, that would not be owed to others.  However, this should be done by helping them in their own country, and not giving away one's own.  American economics and monetary policy probably is shafting them a lot more than the border patrol ever could.

    This cartoon is a Leftwing version of "Palin-esque."

  • Must be hard living with all that hate. That is typical of right-wing conservatives though. Just look at the hate they are spewing towards the children coming here running away from the dangers they face everyday. Conservatives want to say they are the party of "christian values" yet they deny God's children a safe haven from evil. Pitiful......

    I don't agree with everything Bruno says on here and I'm sure they don't agree with me on a lot too, but he has you beat all to **** when it comes to common sense and compassion.

    I'm sure that pitchfork you wield matches your flaming red suit with horns and a tail that you wear.

  • Every once in a while you utter a line that pretty much just sums up your life.  This is one of them. Thank you for giving us this window into the place where your soul should be located...sweetie.

    You still have no clue who I am Richard bruno Craninum

    Just goes to show you how you don't know everything. I am a avid collector of comic books and have been since the birth of my son. Bruno is so right in the statement below. That was a chauvinistic remark. But why should anyone be surprised at that though coming from you. True colors coming through.

    You know it takes a person that goes and looks for defamation to see it others words you are no exception to the rule. You where either not hugged enough or simply left to your own entertainment as a child. BTW collecting comic books is totally different than knowing what they mean or association of that meaning. SO I guess by your logic  Captain America was a fool to go fight in WWII, Batman is a terrorist, Wolverine has anger issues and Professor X is a child molester. Does that about sum up what you get from collecting comic books? 

    Since Kansas is considered the heart land, and it's a farmer state much like here I do not know any cretinous liberals who farm. I think they are way to worried about gettng their wittle hands dirty to be honest. Liberals don't do manual labor, if they did they would know how hard it is to earn a dollar and wouldn't be so easily influenced to give tax payer dollars away on things like illegals crossing our borders, or to keep people on the gubment teat for life.

    Hence the foundation that Clark Kent/Superman was reared on. He never lies, unlike Liberals and is for Truth, Justice and the America way the very things that Liberals are 100% against. Wholesome family values are not part of a liberal household upbringning for their rug rats. Never has been.

    Neither of you two should worry about the splinter in my eye till you remove the plank from yours.

    BTW where in Homo's post did he say Chauvinistic remark. I tell ya you two need to get a room..

    I'm just wondering if the cartoonist had copyright permission to detach the true meaning of Supermans arrival to make a sick joke.

  • Bruno, as you can probably guess, Horsey tend to ber a bit more to left than I am. In this case we do need to do something to control the influx of undocumented unsponsored ILLEGAL imigrants streaming across our border. And yes, they are bringing diseases with them do to poor medical care and no vaccinations in their country of origin. How do we know what we are getting if we don't control the influx? Most other countries are very strict about their immigration policies. Why should we not be? There simply is no money for this. Yeah, Yeah, I know them mean ole republicans won't pass a bill to borrow money to take care of this problem--UNTIL THE BORDER IS SECURE.

  • Just goes to show you how you don't know everything. I am a avid collector of comic books and have been since the birth of my son. Bruno is so right in the statement below. That was a chauvinistic remark. But why should anyone be surprised at that though coming from you. True colors coming through.

    I think instead of comic books you should have been reading the Bible and learned a little respect and loving kindness.

  • "Well geewhizz let me enlighten you since "girls" don't read comic books sweetie."

    Every once in a while you utter a line that pretty much just sums up your life.  This is one of them. Thank you for giving us this window into the place where your soul should be located...sweetie.

  • need4speed, July 29, 2014 4:46PM

    "Typical Horsey cartoon. I don't often agree with him, but I love his artwork."

    So, by saying that this political cartoon is "typical" of his work, I assume that you mean that it is succinct, insightful, great use of analogies and metaphors and punchy, because that is Horsey's strengths.  What don't you agree with in this one? 

  • What comic book did you read were the Kents were considered "conservatives" and Luther was a "flaming liberal"?   I guess I missed that edition....LOL !!

    Well geewhizz let me enlighten you since "girls" don't read comic books sweetie. Wholesome family values, respect of others, respect for all forms of life and since Martha Clark Kent was unable to have children then I guees you can say she was Pro Life and not Pro-Choice since she took him in as their son. Belief in truth, which is a concept that escapes Liberals, Justice, another concept that evades Liberals, and the American way, which is a concept that Liberals wish to get rid of.

    Luther, a flaming Liberal much like yourself sweetie, hates all that Superman stands for and wants nothing better than to kill Superman. In other words there's a Lex Luther in the White House right now. 

    Here ends the lesson sweetie.

  • Typical Horsey cartoon. I don't often agree with him, but I love his artwork.

  • What comic book did you read were the Kents were considered "conservatives" and Luther was a "flaming liberal"?   I guess I missed that edition....LOL !!

  • Same would'a happened if they found Jesus Christ!

  • Someone that'a just a plain smart a$$ is more like it. But he was found by hard working conservative farmers and not namby pamby Liberals who would have reared him to believe he was entitled to everything hate his country, call everyone who disagreed with him racist, bigot, haters and use his powers for selfish reasons but claim he was for the poor and middle class.

    Why you think Luther hates him so much? Luther's a flaming Liberal and thinks he's entitiled to his powers...