|
||||||||||||
|
News Sections
Citizen Journalism
Marketplace
The State Journal
Newspaper Subscriptions |
A former Kentucky Association of Counties employee, fired in 2005, has been awarded $836,780 in damages for wrongful termination. In the Franklin Circuit Court civil case, a jury last week awarded Frankfort's Jenni Philpot Clark $500,000 for compensation including fringe benefits, she would have received from her termination date to her 67th birthday. The award added $250,000 for embarrassment, humiliation and mental distress from the date of her firing to the present; $50,000 for future embarrassment, humiliation or mental distress; and $36,780 for compensation, including fringe benefits, Clark should have received during her employment. "Jenni is grateful to have finally received her day in court," said her attorney, Charles D. Cole with Sturgill, Turner, Barker & Moloney law firm in Lexington. "We are obviously pleased with the result." Bob Arnold, executive director of KACo, said Monday he couldn't comment on the case and referred questions to Frankfort attorney William E. Johnson, who represented KACo. Johnson could not be reached for comment. Clark was director of KACo's Advanced Revenue Program from 1990 until she was fired in August 2005.
In the fall of 2000, Clark participated in opposing a sexually hostile, offensive and retaliatory working environment, Cole said. In May 2005, Clark was listed as a witness in a separate lawsuit " Sandra M. Chapman, et al, v. KACo " filed by several of her co-workers. "She suffered retaliation as a result of such participation, culminating in the wrongful termination of her employment," Cole said. According to Clark's 2005 lawsuit, retaliation included "approved pay raises being denied to hermultiple unsuccessful attempts at termination of her employment, her eventual termination, transfers to smaller and less desirable office space, retaliatory attacks upon her work performance (and) her character." The lawsuit claimed the defendants committed "outrageous conduct" by inflicting misery on Clark "for her lawful exercise of her right, in good faith, to oppose a discriminatory and sexually hostile and retaliatory work environment," and to report or disclose "certain actual or suspected violations of the law, includingcertain taxing, financial disclosure and/or securities laws" concerning the KACo
The defendants denied Clark's allegations and sought to have her lawsuit dismissed.
After the trial court refused to dismiss the suit, the defendants appealed to the Kentucky Court of Appeals where it was dismissed. The case returned to Franklin Circuit Court with Special Judge Roger Crittenden presiding.
In the lawsuit, Clark did not seek to get her job back with KACo. She is now working as a certified fitness instructor at both YMCA facilities in Frankfort, Cole said. Crittenden said Monday a judgment has not been filed. Once that happens, the defendants will have 30 days to file an appeal. Comments
Please note by clicking on "Post" you acknowledge that you have read the
Terms of Service
and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed.
State-Journal.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
Posted by sickofreadingcrapcomments April 21, 2008
I will add that every time I turn around I hear some story about Bob getting someone he knows a job, or somebody not getting one because Bob recommended someone else. I've heard these stories for years. I don't know him.
Posted by okaywhatever April 18, 2008
I work for KACo and it's without a doubt the best company I've ever worked for! So, on that note I would say the reasons Bob Arnold keeps his job are because he's an intelligent business man, more than generous to his employees and always willing to help his employees in any way he can whether it be personal or business related. So, I would hardly call KACo a hostile working environment and last I checked there were no dinosaurs around here!
Posted by answerman April 17, 2008
Folks,
Remember two things... Bob Arnold represented Franklin County - the taxpayer cost because of female harrassment - well over $5,000,000 Bob Arnold represents all counties - the taxpayer cost because of female harrassment - $836,780.00 plus attorney fees. Will it/he ever stop. How does this guy keep his job? Is it because he has a golf tournament, is it because he is handicapped? Can someone explain?
Posted by pinpointers April 17, 2008
maybe that's why the poor thinkg was drinking on the job....
Posted by ema April 15, 2008
Poor thing must have not known what she was getting into when she went to work for KACo. The KACo crowd was part of the crowd that hung out at Flynn's went BopTrot hit the fan. Lots of partying, drinking, affairs, etc. going on with that bunch. Not a crowd for the innocent or faint of heart to keep company with.
Posted by answerman April 15, 2008
Isn't this the same Bob Arnold who was county judge executive for Franklin county and wouldn't listen to the female staff of the county jail about rape and harrassment allegations. This cost the county more than $5m that we are still paying off.
Now we can add another million. When are companies and organizations going to quit employing dinosaurs that treat women with strong arm tactics. I hope she gets more when KACO appeals. Login above or Register to comment. |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||