|
||||||||||||
|
News Sections
Citizen Journalism
Marketplace
The State Journal
Newspaper Subscriptions |
Home |
Back
Ex-firefighter who beat wife gets out earlyApril 29, 2008
A former Franklin County firefighter sentenced to five years for burglary and assaulting his ex-wife has been freed on shock probation. David Courtney, 40, broke into the home of his ex-wife, Donna Courtney, and waited for her return before strangling her with an electrical cord, tearing her clothes and shoving her head into a toilet, according to Assistant Commonwealth's Attorney Dana Todd. Donna Courtney fled to a nearby fire station, where David Courtney chased her and continued the assault until firefighters pulled him off of her, Todd said. Courtney pleaded guilty at a Sept. 28, 2007, arraignment and has been incarcerated at the Franklin County Regional Jail since his Dec. 6, 2006 arrest. Franklin County Fire Chief Gary Watts said at the time of the incident Courtney had not been a county firefighter for "years." The Courtneys were divorced before his arrest in 2006, Todd said. Courtney's friends and family appeared in court in support of his probation as Circuit Judge Thomas Wingate heard testimony from Todd and Courtney's attorney, Chris Olds. "This defendant is a serious risk," Todd said in court Friday when Courtney was freed. "He's been offending since 1995."
Conditions of Courtney's probation include wearing a SCRAM alcohol monitor for 60 days, 30 days in Alcoholic's Anonymous, domestic violence counseling, random drug screening and no female interaction for six months. Courtney is also not permitted to patronize bars. "If I hear of you in a bar, in Lexington or Louisville, honky-tonkin', you're going back to jail," Wingate said as he read conditions of Courtney's probation.
She said those factors include multiple violations of protective orders, a number of partners and victims, escalating violence, and substance abuse, stalking, strangulation, increasing violence when the victim and perpetrator separate and assault in the presence of others. "Every single one of these factors is present in this case," Todd said.
Shock probation is designed to scare offenders into good behavior by releasing them after a portion of the sentence is complete. Domestic violence protective orders filed against Courtney in 1995, 1998 and 2006 and he was convicted of violating protective orders in 1998, 2006 and 2007, court files said. He was convicted of terroristic threatening in 1995, wanton endangerment in 2002, theft by deception in 2002, June of 2006 and September of 2006 and theft by unlawful taking in 2003, according to the files. "I don't want to find out the hard way if he's learned his lesson," Todd said. Comments
Please note by clicking on "Post" you acknowledge that you have read the
Terms of Service
and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed.
State-Journal.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
Next 10 Comments
Posted by tanyaky May 11, 2008
sweet pea, it is not used correctly at all
Irregardless to others: In spite of others??? That makes no sense at all.
Posted by juscq May 11, 2008
Smartgirl, I believe what CUE was saying in his statement "Defensive time for confessions" was that your comments leading up to this seemed defensive in regards to the possibility that you could be former girlfriend of Courtney's. It is then suggested that if there is more you want to tell us please do, confess to it.
Posted by Sweet Pea May 9, 2008
Tanya, you might want to check out the nearest dictionary.
According to the Encarta Dictionary (English): Irregardless (adverb) means the same as regardless, which means "in spite of everything" It's also listed in the Webster's Dictionary
Posted by stevens_tanya May 9, 2008
CUE: irregardless is not a word!
Posted by CUE May 7, 2008
Smartgirl, Irregardless to others i may support and their comments, this forum is for entertainment and information purposes. Please do not take my responces to seriously. My 11th grade education level can be difficult to follow at times but I do my best!
Posted by code3mmc May 6, 2008
This man needs to be in jail. Period.
Posted by smartgirl May 6, 2008
CUE--No, you didn't say that. Someone did. However, the way you write, it is very hard to make any sense of anything. What is "defensive time for confessions"? And how, if you agree with mrserious are you on my case? I'm all for guns and protection. Please define you stance and make sense. Very odd.
Posted by CUE May 5, 2008
Smartgirl, I never said he was an ex'boyfriend of yours. Is it a defensive time for confessions! We are listening!
Posted by mrserious May 5, 2008
""History and statistics prove that when people are attacked with potentially lethal force, the MOST EFFECTIVE way to stop it is equal or greater force."
kinda like IRAQ right?" Well, that wasn't the subject, but yes, it could be. A DEAD terrorist jihadist won't build any bombs or fly any planes into buildings. But why confuse the issue by dragging politics into this? The fact remains, and you haven't rebutted it, that force stops force. Justice Department statistics demonstrate that. Look it up. Or waste time with that kind of remark in your next 'tirade'.
Posted by smartgirl May 5, 2008
CUE...what in the world are you even talking about. I'm right here, first of all. I don't sit around all day looking at the state journal. I have a life. Second, because I believe people have a right to protect themselves, this means this redneck was an ex-boyfriend of mine? Uh, I don't think so. I'm not stupid, and if he or anyone else breaks in my house, my husband and I will protect our children with deadly force if need be.
Next 10 Comments Login above or Register to comment. |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||