Rick Paul, owner of Rick's White Light Diner, was found in contempt of court Monday and must pay $1,000 to a charity of his choice, for again infringing on the Derby-Pie trademark.
Before U.S. District Judge Joseph Hood in a Lexington courtroom, Paul was found in contempt of court for violating a 1997 permanent injunction signed by Hood, ordering Paul not to infringe on Kern's Kitchen Inc.'s trademark Derby-Pie.
Paul also must pay Kern's Kitchen's attorney fees and costs.
"I am disappointed with the judge's ruling and I accept it," Paul said today. "Our proof was considerably different than Derby Pie's. The judge's ruling was, in part, based on me keeping the Derby Pie in the freezer. I failed because I did not tell the judge that I keep other pies in the freezer and then warm in a microwave prior to service."
Kern's Kitchen Inc., of Louisville " owner of the federally and state registered Derby-Pie trademark " filed an April motion in federal court claiming Paul violated the permanent injunction.
Kern's sought up to $1 million in damages, punitive damages, costs and attorney fees.
Louisville attorney Don Cox today said Kern's is pleased with the outcome.
"We're trying to get this guy to leave us alone," Cox said. "It's not about the money. It's about him complying with the permanent injunction and not infringing on the Derby-Pie trademark."
Cox said Kern's attorney fees would amount to "several thousand dollars."
According to Kern's Kitchen's motion in April:
>Private investigator John Landreth ate lunch at the White Light Diner on Jan. 15.
>A hand-lettered sign hung at the restaurant's entrance stating, "Have a Piece of Derby Pie."
>After lunch, Landreth's female assistant ordered a slice of "Derby Pie," referring to the sign. The waitress brought her a slice and was asked about an identical looking pie displayed under plastic wrap. The waitress said that was a whole "Derby Pie," which Landreth purchased for $18.
>When asked why the pie was not on the menu, the investigators were told it was the same as the "Bluegrass Bourbon Pie" listed on the menu.
>Then Paul spoke, saying the "Bluegrass Bourbon Pie" was not listed as "Derby Pie" because "'that damn pie had caused him to be sued for $350,000.'"
>After a discussion about the lawsuit, Paul said although he had stood up to Kern's Kitchen, he had not won the suit, which was the "reason for the menu listing "Derby Pie' under a different name." Basically, Paul was selling a similar pie to the Derby-Pie chocolate nut pie, calling it "Bluegrass Bourbon Pie," but still advertising it as a Derby-Pie brand product.
>Landreth said when his assistant then made reference to the Derby Pie sign outside, "Mr. Paul then revealed his master planconcerning how he intended to "make fools of the Kern's people, their lawyers and the courts.'"
>Then Paul produced from his freezer a real Derby-Pie brand frozen product in its original box. Paul said "when he was taken to task by "them' he intended to produce the "real Derby Pie' and offer to sell them a piece, thereby fulfilling their request for "Derby Pie,' and making fools of them since they could do nothing about his actions."
>The assistant then asked whether the Derby-Pie product was for sale. Paul "laughingly replied "sure, but it will cost you $80.'" He explained he needed to keep it in stock for his own protection in case "'they show up' about the "Derby Pie.'"
According to Paul's court affidavit on May 5:
>He didn't remember investigator Landreth coming to his diner. "For 11 years now I have been asked about the Derby Pie lawsuit," Paul said. "There have been a lot of stories shared by customers over the years.
>He nor his waitress has ever called the White Light Diner's Kentucky Bourbon Pie a Derby-Pie.
>Kentucky Bourbon Pie "has pecans and chocolate and bourbon in it. Kern's Derby-Pie has walnuts, chocolate and no bourbon in it. I have never called my pie Bluegrass Bourbon Pie.
>He said he has never had "a master plan. I have never wanted to make fools out of Kern's or their lawyers or the courts."
>He said Derby Pie is a "Kentucky tradition but it is Kern's trademark. I posted a sign in January 2008 advertising Derby Pie. I bought the Kern's pie and offered it for sale."
>He said he "did attempt to inject some humor into this matter. This may have been poor judgment on my part. I am willing to publicly apologize to the plaintiffs. But I never have called my pie Derby Pie. I have consistently called it Kentucky Bourbon Pie.
Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed.
State-Journal.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
If, as you say, you're not Chuk, then who are you? You wouldn't want to hide behind a computer screen in a cowardly fasion, after all. If, as you say, you are not Chuk, then why rise to his defense? If, as you say, you are not Chuk, why is Chuk so special to you? Do you always hold his hand? If, as you say, you are not Chuk, then why do you have such a sweet, longing, desire to be his loving protector?
132.
Posted by sojourner June 14, 2008
If, as you say, you're not Chuk, then who are you? You wouldn't want to hide behind a computer screen in a cowardly fasion, after all. If, as you say, you are not Chuk, then why rise to his defense? If, as you say, you are not Chuk, why is Chuk so special to you? Do you always hold his hand? If, as you say, you are not Chuk, then why do you have such a sweet, longing, desire to be his loving protector?
131.
Posted by nativeson June 14, 2008
"Did you hear that?"
You're having aural hallucinations in addition to your paranoia ideation. It's really time to see the doctor again, JQ.
130.
Posted by sojourner June 14, 2008
Did you hear that?
129.
Posted by nativeson June 14, 2008
"It's a fascinating psychological drama, and the visuals were absolutely breathtaking. I wish I could remember the name of it...I think you would find it meaningful."
What's fascinating is your delusions and inability to answer the questions that you've raised. Asked for specifics you give a long-winded review of a movie you can't name.
That's your pattern and the mark of the coward that you are. And pointing to others to try to brand them with your own guilt won't change that.
That's what this must be all about, your nagging guilt over something you did, trying to project it all off to someone else. Do you get off on psychoanalyzing yourself in a public forum this way, where you can engage in this narcissism without any responsibility, trying to smear others with your own guilt?
Wow, now THAT'S sick, JQ.
128.
Posted by sojourner June 14, 2008
I once saw a Western, I'm not sure of the title as it was a foreign movie and was in Hindu (the cinematography was amazing). Anyhow, the gist of the move was an older gunslinger had taken in a younger less competent gunslinger and showed him the ropes. However, the character of the lesser gunslinger was just that, lesser. The movie progresses (the landscapes were absolutely amazing) and the better gunslinger is mortally wounded in a shootout. The lesser gunslinger pretends to comfort the better gunslinger but a closeup of his hands shows him literally stealing the dieing man's money bag. The lesser gunslinger rides off, very proud of himself for thinking he's outdone the better gunslinger. All is fine with the lesser gunslinger but then he starts to become haunted by the memory of the better gunslinger. He is riddled with guilt and paranoia. No matter how much he tries to shrug it off and act like he's done nothing wrong he can't escape the truth and he goes crazy, accusing everyone of being an enemy and out to get him. It's a fascinating psychological drama, and the visuals were absolutely breathtaking. I wish I could remember the name of it...I think you would find it meaningful.
127.
Posted by nativeson June 14, 2008
More to the point, sojourner - you made vague allusions to alleged crimes. Come on out and name them, so you can be subpoenaed, or admit your cowardice and shut up.
126.
Posted by nativeson June 14, 2008
"So neither you nor Chuk should have a problem with my anonymity. As for the tenor of my postings, I am but a mirror, reflecting that which is displayed by others."
You are a cracked mirror, a flawed reflection of your own failings, an empty vessel that makes a noise but is empty of substance. And you're a coward, still and always, when you want to call out other people's names but won't name yourself. There's no other word for it, except perhaps rat, weasel, fink, squeal and other terms reserved for those who want to fling imprecations without being willing to face the music for their insults. The Founders found it disgusting enough to put prohibitions against it in the Constitution, and it's denounced consistently in Western culture. The anonymous pen, writing venom from behind a veil, has always been despised.
And despite your persistent delusions, my name isn't Chuk.
125.
Posted by sojourner June 14, 2008
I'd have no problem quoting Shakespeare to anybody. But thank you for your concern Mule. But let's get something straight. Chuk would still be hiding behind a computer screen, had his identity not been discovered and unless your name really is Mule I don't see you advertising your true identity. So neither you nor Chuk should have a problem with my anonymity. As for the tenor of my postings, I am but a mirror, reflecting that which is displayed by others.
124.
Posted by stubbornasamule June 14, 2008
"Posted by sojourner 2 hours ago
Chuk, I think this gets more to the heart of what I was attempting to express to you, for you, about you, for you are...
"A knave; a rascal; an eater of broken meats; a base, proud, shallow, beggarly, three-suited, hundred-pound, filthy, worsted-stocking knave; a lily-livered, action-taking, whoreson, glass-gazing, superserviceable, finical rogue; one-trunk-inheriting slave; one that wouldst be a bawd in a way of good service, and art nothing but the composition of a knave, beggar, coward, pandar, and the son and heir of a mongrel bitch; one whom I will beat into clamorous whining, if thou deniest the least syllable of thy addition."
It's very easy to hide behind a computer screen and use a keyboard to express yourself.
Would you say these words to someone's/anyone's face? I doubt that you could stand your ground long enough to do it.
Copyright Frankfort Publishing Co., LLC 1995-2009. All Rights Reserved.
Content may not be republished without the expressed written consent of the publisher.