Quantcast
Sat Nov 22 2008 3:11 AM
Email:   Password:     |  Register/Subscribe
Search Site:
Advanced
Search
  Archive

FREE Sample
PDF Edition
The State Journal
Newspaper Subscriptions


Home | Back

Library expansion could aid records storage

Email To A Friend
Printer Friendly
Comments
Add to Reddit Add to Digg Add to del.icio.us

The proposed $11 million expansion of the state library could ease problems related to storing records from county courthouses across the state, an official says.

Barbara Teague said the project has been a priority since the 1980s but never funded by the legislature. It would add 100,000 cubic feet of storage space for archives from the courts and other state agencies.

"Now we are at the point where we're out of space," said Teague, archivist and records administrator for the Kentucky Department of Libraries and Archives
Currently, 34,000 cubic feet of court files are stored at an annual cost of $155,000 the KDLA facility on Coffee Tree Road. KDLA also receives files from other state agencies.

The library expansion project would include climate and humidity controlled storage, but Teague said the price will inevitably increase as delays continue.

Creating additional storage space would also allow all the records to be kept in a centralized location.

"Right now, the records are dispersed throughout courthouses and state agencies across the state," Teague said.

Maintaining the court records, which include civil, criminal and family court cases, provides important genealogical and historic information, she said.

"They show us how people lived," Teague said. "It's a wealth of information."

Another important aspect is revising the records retention schedule said Kentucky Court of Appeals Judge Thomas Wine.

Wine is chair of a committee created by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Minton that met Wednesday to address the issue of records retention.

The Court Records Retention Committee includes representatives from the public defenders office, prosecutors, KDLA and the Administrative Office of the Courts.

"I think it's a good idea for the chief justice to open this process up," Wine said. "Normally it's done through the administrative bureaucracy, but this will allow input from the users of records. That ensures a more user-friendly system."

The main problem is that the records retention schedule was suspended in 2007 because critical files were destroyed in Jefferson County, Wine said.

"It's piling up in boxes," he said. "We are trying to clean out the attic and
basement."

The Court Records Retention Committee will examine the various elements of the records retention schedule and make recommendations to reduce costs while retaining crucial information. Some records must be retained permanently, such as felony criminal cases and family court issues.

Some members of the committee suggested that some subpoenas, continuances or summons could be shredded after five years. Other ideas include scanning files and storing them in a digital format, but Woodford County Circuit Clerk Tricia Kittinger said the process would be expensive and time-consuming.

Retired Franklin Circuit Judge Roger Crittenden is a member of the committee and said the issue of what records to retain and for how long is an important issue. He also said the KDLA expansion is a priority.

"They need the facilities no matter what happens," Crittenden said.




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. State-Journal.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
 2 Total Comments
2.
    Posted by trying September 6, 2008
Now, answerman, I have to agree there. It's done elsewhere and would actually be cost saving in the long run.

1.
    Posted by answerman September 6, 2008
This is absolutely necessary but Woodford County Circuit Clerk Tricia Kittinger has made a dinosaur statement.
Digitizing a paper document is time consuming on the front end but anytime the data is needed from here to eternity is just a few key strokes away.

Can you imaging looking through a pile of boxes for a single file from a court case from 5 years ago. If you can even identify what county the box is being stored.

This is what is wrong with elected officials, they do not think past the end of their noses. All they see is the cost today, not the cost savings generated many years down the road.

This could be job creator too. You wouldn't need a college degree to digitize these documents, it would provide a good job with health and retirement benefits and keep these less skilled workers off government assistance.

Like death and taxes, documents will always need to be retained. Lets do it right.


Terms of Service Copyright Frankfort Publishing Co., LLC 1995-2008. All Rights Reserved.
Content may not be republished without the expressed written consent of the publisher.
Dix Communications