Quantcast
Sat Nov 22 2008 12:21 AM
Email:   Password:     |  Register/Subscribe
Search Site:
Advanced
Search
  Archive

FREE Sample
PDF Edition
The State Journal
Newspaper Subscriptions


Home | Back

Outrage over pay increase for LRC director

Email To A Friend
Printer Friendly
Comments
Add to Reddit Add to Digg Add to del.icio.us

933d167c4d3943a4b87b7c31a878b8b4bd3a4ffb_shermanmug-thumb


Bobby Sherman

Rep. Carl Rollins, D-Midway, said Bobby Sherman, director of the Legislative Research Commission, should either resign or refuse to accept a pay raise " boosting his salary from $132,000 to $195,000, a $62,160 increase.

"I'm incensed," Rollins said. "It sends a terrible message to state employees. They got a 1 percent raise." Sherman's was 47 percent.

A panel of legislative leaders authorized the pay increase Wednesday afternoon by a vote of 11 to 5.

"Anybody who voted for this should be run out of office," Rollins said. "I don't care what party they're in."

The pay increase makes Sherman one of the highest paid employees in state government " earning more than Gov. Steve Beshear's $120,000.
City and county government employees received pay increases between 3 and 4 percent this year.

Senate President David Williams, R-Burkesville, said Sherman deserved the increase and would have retired with out it. Sherman declined to comment according to the Associated Press.

Other legislative leaders expressed similar outrage, including Sen. Julian Carroll, D-Frankfort, and Rep. Derrick Graham, D-Frankfort.

Carroll said Sherman has been a good director but that there are also qualified individuals who could replace him if he retired. Sherman said he would retire without a "significant" pay raise, according to Carroll.

"I don't think paying him that kind of salary is justified," Carroll said. "He's replaceable."

Carroll said he can't support such a pay increase when the state is under the constraints of a tight budget.

Rep. Derrick Graham, D-Frankfort, said the decision to give Sherman a 47 percent increase was "arrogant" and "an abuse of power."

"It's an embarrassment to the institution," Graham said. "It gives the institution a black eye because we make the policy and say it doesn't apply to us."

Graham said thousands of qualified and experienced state employees retired this year because it was in their best financial interests.

"We all walked away from the budget and knew we didn't have the money," Graham said. "There should have been no exceptions. I'm insulted by it."

Several university presidents declined to accept part or all of their salary bonuses this year and Sherman should do likewise, Graham said.

Graham also said the news of Sherman's raise was particularly painful for state employees who learned on Wednesday their health insurance premiums will be increasing by $2.50 per month.

The vote in support of the pay raise was largely along party lines, with Republicans in favor of it and most Democrats opposed. Supporters include:
>Senate President David Williams, R-Burkesville
>Senate Majority Whip Carroll Gibson, R-Leitchfield
>Senate Majority Floor Leader Dan Kelly, R-Springfield
>Senate Majority Caucus Chair Dan Seum, R-Fairdale
>Senate President Pro Tempore Katie Stine, R-Southgate
>Senate Minority Caucus Chair Johnny Turner, D-Drift
>Senate Minority Floor Leader Ed Worley, D-Richmond
>House Minority Floor Leader Jeff Hoover, R-Jamestown
>House Minority Whip Stan Lee, R-Lexington
>House Minority Caucus Chair Bob DeWeese, R-Louisville
>House Majority Whip Rob Wilkey, D-Scottsville
Those members of the committee who voted against the pay raise include:
>House Speaker Jody Richards, D-Bowling Green
>Senate Minority Whip Joey Pendleton, D-Hopkinsville
>House Majority Leader Rocky Adkins, D-Sandy Hook
>House Speaker Pro Tem Larry Clark, D-Louisville
>House Majority Caucus Chair Charlie Hoffman, D-Georgetown
The Associated Press contributed to this report.




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. State-Journal.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
   Next 10 Comments of 46 Total Comments
46.
    Posted by trying October 23, 2008
The people who could find grounds to fire him are the very same who approved this in the first place. Firing him would be acknowledging that they did something wrong. Williams would never do that.

45.
    Posted by phillipsonline October 22, 2008
Is this guy still there? You would think by the deserving uproar from the public, they would simply rid themselves of this guy. You'll never make me believe there isn't someone down there that could do the job just as well. It's ridiculous!

44.
    Posted by jbreeze42 October 20, 2008
a horiffic percentage of people have lost their homes, jobs, livelyhood, sense of security, hope for the future and then bank and oil executives and politions give another slap in the face as they continue to give themselves raises, bonuses, and retirement packages. They do not care about America or its citizens, nor do they have any morals or honor concerning themselves. Notice how gas prices have dropped right before election! What a coincidence!

43.
    Posted by AdWest October 18, 2008
What is going on here?

42.
    Posted by terrell1963 October 17, 2008
DP,

What happened?

Simple - Williams posted a letter comparing the salary increases Richards provided to his group and magically the problem gets swept under the carpet. Typical bureaucrat coverup.

The only chance We the People have to fight the pork fattened bureaucrats is to vote each and every one out of office. If the incumbent doesn't get the hint they will be looking for another trough to feed from, they will not do the job they have been elected to do.

I also believe there should be term limits on the legislature just as there is on the Governor's office.

41.
    Posted by realrepublican October 12, 2008
You all keep voting for the same lame, one sided, and self promoting politicians each and every time. If you all want to do more than complain about the way it is vote for some with a working mans outlook on our state and our freedoms. I watched the video at the below link and found myself switching to independent just to be able to fully support this man if he ever runs again.

http://www.youtube.c...qX-6z4qI

40.
    Posted by smartgirl1 October 9, 2008
They said they need to introduce respective legislation to reverse this deal. They would have to wait until the new session starts to introduce something like that. That would be January.

When is that Williams guy up for re-election? His district needs to know that he has been misusing their trust and is wasting taxpayers money.

39.
    Posted by RangerDanger October 7, 2008
DP, Richards decided to hold off until closer til November. He figures can use it to get some votes for the Dems.

Politicians do it all the time.

38.
    Posted by DP October 7, 2008
What happened to Jody Richard's big plan to get the pay raise rescinded? Haven't seen another word about that....maybe just some more posturing by one of own elected losers?

37.
    Posted by realdeal October 6, 2008
"This video is why I will not vote Republican or Democrat ever again"

maybe a name change should occur then realrepublican.


   Next 10 Comments

Terms of Service Copyright Frankfort Publishing Co., LLC 1995-2008. All Rights Reserved.
Content may not be republished without the expressed written consent of the publisher.
Dix Communications