Quantcast
Home | Back

Curve where teen died will get safety improvements

Share_email E-mail Story    |    Share_print Print Story    |    Comments    |   

The state plans to make several improvements at a curve on U.S. 460 where a local high school student died in March – but a safety advocate says the measures are insufficient.

According to a letter from Transportation Secretary Joe Prather dated May 5, additional chevrons have been installed at mile point 4.3 on U.S. 460 near the Scott–Franklin county line.

On March 14 Jennifer “Jenn” Penn, a senior at Franklin County High School, died in a single car accident near that location. According to the accident report, her 2001 Dodge Neon slid sideways and struck a guardrail after losing traction.

The road was wet, and Penn was traveling between 55 and 60 mph at the time of accident – signs along the curve suggest reducing speed to  35 mph. She was returning home to Georgetown after performing in the FCHS spring musical “The Wizard of Oz.”

Prather said he’s recommended that highway crews install fluorescent flashing yellow beacons, which have reflective tape to enhance visibility and provide advance warning.

Prather said the agency is also investigating the possibility of installing “high friction material” to address “the pattern of wet-related collisions.”

“We believe the improvements being made at this location will greatly enhance the safety of this curve,” Prather wrote.

A spokesman for the district 7 highway office, which includes Scott County, said a date for the improvements has not been set yet. The additional signage will cost about $5,500 and the new asphalt will use more stone to prevent skidding, according to officials.

However, Gerard Gerhard, a former assistant attorney general and highway safety advocate, said the proposed improvements are “pathetic.”

Gerhard had requested oversized chevrons at the curve and said the chevrons that have been installed are too small – they measure 18 by 24 inches.

“They are too small to ‘command respect or attention’ from motorists,” Gerhard wrote in his response. “The small chevrons are minimally visible during daylight. From a distance at night, they appear like dots.”

The curve at mile point 4.3 is “substantial” and the chevrons don’t do enough to convey the hazard to approaching motorists, Gerhard wrote.

The flashing yellow beacons should be mandatory, Gerhard said, because they are dynamic rather than passive.

“They call someone’s attention to the problem,” he said.

However, he wants them to be installed – not just a recommendation.

“I want them to go ahead and do something,” Gerhard said.

The high-friction material would also be helpful, but the improvements should be implemented, not investigated, he said. In addition, the high-friction material alone is insufficient without additional signage, he said.

“It may prevent them from skidding, but if the signage is not there, there is still a chance they will be going too fast,” he said.

In addition, shortly before the curve, there’s an intersection warning sign that depicts a perpendicular intersection that could mislead motorists that the road ahead is straight, Gerhard said.

He wants the signs modified to show an intersection at a curve –he’s said he’s seen similar signs in other states.

 




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. State-Journal.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
Jump to Page: 1 2
   Next 10 Comments of 12 Total Comments
12.
    Posted by penns May 15, 2009
Here it is.... Jenn died from BLUNT FORCE TRAUMA from the Guardrail. The blunt end of the Guardrail went through the drivers side door as the car slid into it as she over corrected. Had this guardrail been like the others on 460 that slope down, there would have still been damage, but the guardrail would not have gone through the car door, and possibly Jenn would still be with us. Drive the road and observe the other guardrails - they are not the blunt end like was here and the same has been reinstalled in this turn. You never know what tomorrow holds. Don't live with regret and live life to the fullest, just like Jenn.

11.
    Posted by NotFromHere May 15, 2009
I'm no accident reconstructionist, and I have not read the accident report. My daughter was in the play with Jenn, and had been at Waffle House with them before the accident. So obviously, when I happened to go by the site, I was thinking about it, and what could be done to make the area safer when driving. My opinion is just based on what it looked like when I went past the accident site on my way to Cincy.

It didn't look to me like the guardrail was a "battering ram". It looked to me that the guardrail "funneled" her car back onto the road (keeping the car on the road, as it was designed to do), and she over-corrected and hit the guardrail on the opposite side. Again, I did not read the accident report. I was just thinking about what could have happened.

10.
    Posted by Need4speed May 15, 2009
OK, I agree that people drive stupid. This is still no excuse for not adding safety equipment to the curve. If I understand some of y'alls logic, we probably don't need seatbelts or airbags because the only people that need them are driving stupid. We shouldn't use ground fault interrupters because only stupid people grab the sink and the toaster at the same time. My point is, you can excercise due diligence and still make a mistake. The technology exists to make this curve safer and more survivable when (not if) accidents occur. Had an energy absorbing gaurdrail been in place instead of the battering ram, Miss Jenn might still be with us. When viewed in this light, the cost of the needed improvements becomes very inexpensive indeed.

9.
    Posted by RPENN May 14, 2009
This all may help,but,Jenn would still be here if the guard rail had been anything but a blunt end. The lights would help they have a mile down the road near elkhorn creek. This curve has MANY issues!

8.
    Posted by bodeen May 14, 2009
AREYOUKIDDINGME - Twitterpaint, This is tragic for sure, but you both are right. It is up to us to drive safe & pay attention to the warning signs. Anybody that drives a certain road daily, knows what the conditions are.
This is just unfortunate.

7.
    Posted by Twitterpaint May 14, 2009
I agree with AREYOUKIDDINGME. I'm not sure more notification of the turn will help. People who drive this road frequently know the turns. You still have to exercise the proper caution and decelerate to the suggested speed, especially in inclement weather conditions.

6.
    Posted by Whatajoke! May 14, 2009
The State could make that curve padded but it's not going to change the way people drive on that road; like it's a race track.

5.
    Posted by Velvetymold May 14, 2009
It's a shame that it has come to this. I can guarantee you they already knew there was a danger there but just didn't want to put the money up to fix it. Just another bandaid.

4.
    Posted by Need4speed May 14, 2009
The guardrail in question has been repaired. The problem is, the rail was put back as it was with no improvements. The end of the gaurdrail points into the oncoming traffic making it a stationary "battering ram". Tha rail should curve away gently so that anybody striking the end of it would get a push instead of an impact. An even better solution would be to make the end of the guardrail energy absorbing as opposed to totally ridgid. The technolgy exists. Additional chevrons? That's just more crap to hit. Adding shoulder to that section of road would be a help as well. Sounds to me like the proposed "improvements" are just enough to get by. Try again KYDOT.

3.
    Posted by Polaris May 14, 2009
Jenn Penn was a vibrant, beautiful, caring and talented young lady. She is missed tremendously at Franklin County and I am happy to see that safety issues are being addressed to help prevent another tragedy such as this from happening again.

   Next 10 Comments | Home | Back