Quantcast
Home | Back

Group urges end to death penalty in Kentucky

Share_email E-mail Story    |    Share_print Print Story    |    Comments    |   

Kentucky needs to join 15 other states that have abolished the death penalty, speakers who oppose it told an audience at Kentucky State University Tuesday.

They included the grandson of a woman brutally murdered by teenage girls, the mother of the youngest killer on Virginia’s death row, and a man who faced execution for three years after being framed in the murder of a prison guard.

They are part of the Journey of Hope, a national group touring Kentucky campuses speaking against the death penalty.

Today, there are 37 people (all but one are men) on Kentucky’s death row. In Kentucky, the death penalty is applied in murders with aggravating circumstances.

No circumstance justifies the death penalty, according to Journey speakers. They include Bill Pelke, whose grandmother was stabbed to death; Terri Steinberg, the mother of Justin Wolfe, the Virginia death row inmate; and Shujaa Graham, whose death sentence was overturned in 1979. 

“It’s on our backs to change this,” said Kate Miller, with the American Civil Liberties Union, as she introduced the speakers in Hathaway Hall Auditorium. “Our tax dollars pay for these murders.”

The death penalty is unjust, unnecessary, expensive and ineffective, Miller said.

The ACLU of Kentucky and The Kentucky Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty invited the advocates to speak and encouraged the more than 100 students in attendance to send postcards to their legislators.

Shujaa Graham

Graham is one of 138 innocent men who lived on death row. “Think about the innocent people who have been condemned to death,” said Graham, who spent three years there before he was cleared.

In and out of trouble in South Central Los Angeles, Graham spent much of his adolescent life in juvenile institutions, until he was sent to Soledad Prison at age 18.

In prison, Graham became a leader of the Black Prison movement as the Black Panther Party expanded. He fought against racism and guard brutality in the prison, he says.

He says that’s why, in 1973, he was framed in the murder of a prison guard at the Deul Vocational Institute, Stockton, Calif. The community became involved in his defense and supported him through four trials. Graham and his co-defendant, Eugene Allen, were sent to San Quentin’s death row in 1976 after a second trial in San Francisco. 

“The most horrifying thing for me was when you would get a visit, the guards escorted you out, they would holler ‘Dead man walking!’ and the other prisoners would get up against the wall as you went by,” said Graham, his voice shaking and sweat forming on his brow.

In 1979, the California Supreme Court overturned the murder conviction. A third trial ended in a hung jury, and after a fourth, Graham and Allen were found not guilty.

“I am here today not because of the system but in spite of the system,” he said. 

Terri Steinberg

A devoted mother who often visits her son on death row, Steinberg asked students to think about the collateral damage that goes with the death penalty.

She held up a photo of her other children and asked, “How do you explain the death penalty to a 4-year-old?”

Steinberg did that after her son, Wolfe, a 19-year-old marijuana dealer, was convicted in 2002 of hiring another dealer to kill a third one. 

Steinberg maintains her son’s innocence and fights the death penalty.

“They’re going to kill my son,” she said fighting tears. “People can prove their innocence and become free. Maybe one day my son will be free, and he can tell this story instead of me.”

She is currently in the appeals process and dreads the outcome. 

“If he does get executed, we’re the ones who will be left behind. How are we going to keep going? How are we going to trust in our justice system knowing what they’ve done to us?”

Bill Pelke

Pelke, the founder of Journey of Hope, arrived at his argument from the other side. He is a murder victim family member who is morally opposed to the death penalty and has dedicated his life to abolishing the practice.

“The death penalty has nothing to do with the healing,” he says. “It just continues the cycle of violence.”

He’s told his story more 5,000 times, but he still choked up Tuesday during the telling. 

Four teenage girls skipped out early from their Indiana high school in 1985. After drinking wine and beer and smoking pot, they decided they needed money to go to a local arcade. One girl knew her neighbor, 78-year-old Ruth Pelke, would invite the other three girls in if they asked for a Bible lesson. 

“She was a very religious woman, and her passion was telling Bible stories to young people,” her grandson said.

She invited them in. 

One girl hit her over the head with a vase; another pulled a knife and stabbed her. Then another took a turn with the knife. The girls ransacked the house and came up with $10 and an old car.

Paula Cooper, 15 at the time, was the one who first pulled out the knife and was deemed the ringleader. When she was sentenced to the electric chair by the state of Indiana, Pelke supported the judge’s decision.

A year later, however, he asked God for compassion for Cooper and her family.

When he imagined his grandparents’ home, he saw his grandmother butchered to death on the dining room floor where they had celebrated Easter and Christmas and birthdays.

Forgiving Cooper changed that.

He became involved in an international crusade on Cooper’s behalf in 1989, and through those efforts, she was removed from death row and her sentence commuted to 60 years.

When she’s paroled, Pelke hopes she’ll spread her story through Journey of Hope.

“People think, ‘If I get revenge, I’ll feel better,’” he said. “The answer is love and compassion. You’re never going to want to see anyone put in the death chamber.”

 




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. State-Journal.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
Jump to Page: 1 2
   Next 10 Comments of 18 Total Comments
18.
    Posted by Luanne November 5, 2009
In Oklahoma if you come in my yard and I can convince the police I felt in ndanger, I can shoot you. Man just did it for the second time a few weeks ago during a daytime break-in. The guys were just robbing the home and died for it.

I punchline is, this man usually comes home for lunch. After he killed a burgerler a few years ago, these numskulls should have had this home on the no fly zone. There were three. One died and the other two robbers are being charged with the dead ones death. Oklahoma justice is almost exactly like Texas justice.

17.
    Posted by maryshera November 5, 2009
"In Texas,if you kill somebody in front of two or more people we will kill you back"

Ron White

Makes perfect sense to me.

16.
    Posted by CHAZ November 5, 2009
Life is precious. It is a most precious gift from our Creator.

It is for that reason that the penalty for destroying life must be the most severe penalty that can be paid.

God required the penalty of loss of life for those who destroyed the life of another. God required it because of the preciousness of life. God also required that there be substantial proof to the crime.

The death penalty is NOT murder. It is the enactment of the law upon those who have been found guilty.

15.
    Posted by cattailky November 5, 2009
I would be all for abolishing the death penalty if life in prison really meant something. Locked up in a dark cell with bread and water to eat, no visitors, no phone, no TV, no recreation, nothing to do all day for the rest of your pathetic life but contemplate what you have done. But because we have to "treat them with respect" (why) they live better than I do. ON MY DIME! I personnally am tired of paying for everybody! Murders and child molesters (let's not forget those fine folks) should be put to death or locked up in a dark hole. But that is mistreating them! We can't do that as a civilized society, can we???

People that murder have no right to life themselves. Why should mercy be shown to them? Was mercy showed to the person being murdered? No. Should we care that you had a bad childhood? No. You are responsible for yourself and your own actions when you become an adult (people tend to forget that).

14.
    Posted by Z_Everson November 4, 2009
There are a lot of great reasons to abolish the death penalty. Here are some from the Kentucky Coalition to Abolish the Drath Penalty (http://kcadp.org), a group of people from all political beliefs, races and religions;


-It's costly"the death penalty is more expensive than life in prison
-It's out of step with modern thinking"Kentuckians prefer prison over execution for murderers
-It's risky"innocent people have been executed
-It's unfair, broken, and arbitrary"the death penalty is not applied equally
-It's unnecessary"the death penalty is not a deterrent
-Victims' families deserve more care and compassion"the death penalty can extend and intensify their suffering

For more details, including research supporting all of those claims, visit http://kcadp.org/why-abolish-the-death-penalty-in-kentucky/ and follow the links.

13.
    Posted by Piranha November 4, 2009
We need to keep the death penalty in Kentucky. If "John" kills someone, he deserves the death penalty. No-one has a right to kill someone else out of hatred. Being a police officer is entirely different. If he has to shoot someone, it's out of self-defense. But, to go and kill someone for money, jewelry, or over a man or woman, etc., is purely murder.

12.
    Posted by melli November 4, 2009
It's not meant to provide closure. It's meant to put an end to a criminal who has committed a horrible crime. It's meant to make sure it will never ever happen again.

Closure doesn't come from having the criminal killed. Any satisfactory feeling is usually more temporary. The victim is still dead. Nothing really changed.

Executions have slowed down and even come to a hold because they have found so many were innocent. They are going back and doing reviews and DNA evidence, where possible. I think they even found somebody was executed in Texas but he hadn't done it. In fact, Texas has been releasing quite a few death row inmates because new DNA evidence shows they have been wrongfully convicted. But just to allow DNA testing to be done and be introduced as new evidence apparently was a tough road to get done. Just shows, you can be innocent for ten years or more and still be unable to prove you were right.

Yep, we better be damn sure we kill the right guy. Otherwise we are no better than the original killer.

11.
    Posted by ryhpez November 4, 2009
Google the Newsom-Christian murders and read about their carjacking, torture, rape and murder at the hands of five savages and then tell me the death penalty is wrong.

10.
    Posted by maryshera November 4, 2009
The ACLU needs to go to Cuba. Those folks could use some help. We're doing just fine...Commies

9.
    Posted by maryshera November 4, 2009
I don't think the death penalty should apply if a person is convicted on circumstantial evidence. But if you got it on video or DNA, put 'em on the post and pull the trigger. No deposit, No return

   Next 10 Comments | Home | Back