Home | Back

Republicans skeptical about Senate hopeful

Share_print Print Story    |    Comments    |   

Although many local Republicans were interested in hearing what Rand Paul had to say, they aren’t ready yet to support him. 

Paul, a U.S. Senate candidate, spoke to about 35 Republicans at The Kitchen on Georgetown Road near Forks of the Elkhorn Monday night.

Franklin Country Republican Chairman Stuart Victor said that was more than usual because there’s a lot of interest in hearing him speak.

Paul preached his fiscally conservative message for about 30 minutes, attacking big government and pork barrel spending.

“We used to be a great exporter,” said Paul, an ophthalmologist from Bowling Green. “Now our number one export is debt.”

He pledged to stop illegal immigration, cut government spending and support term limits.

Three other Republicans are in the primary – Secretary of State Trey Grayson, western Kentucky businessman Bill Johnson and Gurley Martin, a World War II veteran from Owensboro. 

Several Democrats are seeking the nomination of their party, including Lt. Gov. Dan Mongiardo and Attorney General Jack Conway.

Most in attendance Monday said they were undecided on which candidate to support.

For example, Jason Gilbert, 33, of Frankfort, says he agrees with Paul that out-of-control spending in Washington will either require a huge tax increase or a sharp cut in services.

“He is in the right direction for what a lot of people in Kentucky want to hear,” Gilbert said. “He’s sick of the attitude we can keep spending, spending, spending with no cutoff.”

However Gilbert said he disagreed on some issues and wasn’t ready to back Paul yet.

Don Stosberg questioned Paul’s leadership ability and others were concerned about his lack of military experience. Paul said he had founded the Kentucky Taxpayers United and led it for more than 15 years.

Stosberg said that’s not enough.

“I think that’s rather limited leadership experience to ask us to elect him to the U.S. Senate on,” Stosberg said.

Gilbert disagreed and said he likes Paul’s outsider status and doesn’t mind his lack of military service.

“A fresh perspective without a lot of baggage is a benefit,” he said. “I would love to see (military experience) but it’s not a showstopper.”

Paul follows the issues closely and his concerns about economic issues are valid, Stosberg said. However, he’s unconvinced Paul is the best candidate.

“I came away a little undecided on if he’s a nut or not,” Stosberg said.

Paul’s proposals are too simplistic, he said.

“Electing people based on bullet-points is not a wise idea,” Stosberg said.

Stosberg said he’s not satisfied with any of the major Republican or Democratic candidates but he slightly favors Grayson.

“Trey has done his homework and put in his time,” Stosberg said.

 




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. State-Journal.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
Jump to Page: 1 2
   Next 10 Comments of 15 Total Comments
15.
    Posted by Need4speed November 25, 2009
Let it go Dan'l...

14.
    Posted by nautilusfish November 25, 2009
RD habitat is a good charity. I give Carter a thumbs up for his work there. But it ends there.

Some of us remember waiting for gas, Iran hostage crisis, misery index, lame duck 1st term, sky high inflation, high unemployment, etc.

Yes he was in the Navy too. He also said he hated the military. He wasn't good at it as with many other things he has done and still attempts. Foreign policy being one.

I see alot of Carter in our current screw up too.

And Jimmy has no clue what the military is yet alone who served. According to him it is below his level in society. Yet he is quick to use the benefits from those who have. "L"

13.
    Posted by RangerDanger November 24, 2009
I like Carter as a person*, but as a president, he's not memorable (he was terrible from what I hear, but compared to G-Dub and Barry-O, he was a lightweight in the game of "screw things up").

*I dare anyone to put down Habitat for Humanity... It's just too good a program to diss.

12.
    Posted by nautilusfish November 24, 2009
We sure had a draft dodger make it in the Oval Office.

And I agree with N4S that Carter was a speedbump on the highway of life. And now he is a pot hole.

11.
    Posted by RangerDanger November 24, 2009
Since when did military service become a requirement for office? I don't disagree that the people charged with sending our young men and women into harm's way should know what they're getting our soldiers into, but it's not a constitutional requirement, so I don't look at it unless the two candidates are pretty much tied for my vote. Then it comes into play (for the reason above)

10.
    Posted by Need4speed November 24, 2009
BillTaylor:

Trey Grayson: No
Ronald Reagan: Yes, stateside during WWII
Mitch McConnell: not so much
Jim Bunning: No

Thomas Jefferson ..You gotta be kidding me! Why would you even include a founding father in your rant. No he didn't serve in the Continental Army, but he was the principle author of the Declaration of Independence, an act which I'm sure the British considered a hanging offense. Pretty ballsy considering the ACLU hadn't been invented yet and nobody really had a problem with the death penalty.

Frankd6: Jimmy Carter is a jackass and the worst president in my memory until the current one.


   Next 10 Comments | Home | Back