Home | Back

State workers face furloughs, layoffs

Share_print Print Story    |    Comments    |   

Furloughs or layoffs are possible as the state sets to tackle its multi-million dollar budget deficit.

Other solutions could include a four-day work week.

 “It’s a reality this time instead of something people are just hinting about,” said Lee Jackson, president of the Kentucky Association of State Employees. 

“There is a very, very serious crisis when it comes to the budget and revenues.”

Gov. Steve Beshear said the state faces a deficit of $160 million this year and is planning additional budget cuts of 6 percent. He’s already cut $800 million since he took office.

According to the Associated Press, the state faces a shortfall of $464 million in the first year of the biennial budget and $781 million in the second year.

Appropriations and Revenue Committee Chairman Rick Rand said federal stimulus funds will help in the next fiscal year. After that, Rand said, Kentucky will have used up its allotment of stimulus money and could face the sharpest cuts yet.

“Luckily, next year we will have stimulus money,” Rand said. “It will soften the blow.”

Several state officials have said layoffs are likely if any further cuts are required.

Jackson says he’ll fight to avoid furloughs or layoffs with several alternatives. He says he wants to make sure the state is utilizing all the federal funds available, and front-line state workers should be consulted about areas where money can be saved.

A four-day workweek is another way of saving money, Jackson said, without hurting state employees.

Utah state government switched to a four-day workweek in 2008, with offices open from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Monday to Thursday.

 Rep. Carl Rollins, D-Midway, also said it will be harder to avoid layoffs or program cuts in the upcoming budget negotiations.

“This time, people are really going to feel the pain,” he said. 

When it comes to eliminating programs or possible layoffs each agency should be examined individually, Rollins said.

“Cutting across the board is not a good way to do business,” he said.

A four-day workweek could also cut costs and still provide adequate services, Rollins said.

Furloughs have been ordered for state employees in Colorado, California, Hawaii and Maryland. More than 800 have been terminated in Iowa, almost 9,000 in New York and about 700 in Pennsylvania.

In addition to furloughs and layoffs, any further spending cuts will likely reduce services, said Sen. Julian Carroll, D-Frankfort. A constituent recently complained that his 4-year-old daughter’s pre-kindergarten speech therapy program had been eliminated, Carroll said.

“Obviously, those kind of programs and services are going to be reduced,” he said.

In addition to spending cuts, legislators say they’ll also look at ways to raise additional revenue, including taxes, fees and gambling – but some political leaders are sending mixed signals.

Carroll suggested that lawmakers could raise the cigarette tax again, but Rollins said he hasn’t seen any support for such a move.

“We just can’t keep going back to the same well every time,” Rollins said.

Beshear said last week he doesn’t favor any broad-based tax increases for fear they could push Kentucky deeper into recession. That sentiment extends into the Republican-controlled Senate.

“Now is not the time to raise taxes,” said state Sen. Damon Thayer, R-Georgetown. “I don’t sense any sentiment at all in the Senate to raise taxes.”

Asking local school districts to spend some of their reserve funds could also help bolster the state budget, Carroll said.

“We’ve used all our resources,” he said.

However, Rep. Derrick Graham, D-Frankfort, strongly disagreed – he teaches social studies at Frankfort High School.

“It’s out of the question,” he said. “It’s borrowing from Peter to pay Paul. It’s not a good policy to pursue.”

Another possibility would be raising fees for state services, Carroll said. Some fees have not kept pace with the cost of providing services, such as the application for a limousine license, he said.

It only costs the applicant $25 but includes an administrative hearing and a written ruling, Carroll said. It probably costs the state at least a $100 to review a limousine license application, he said.

Other possible candidates for increased fees include birth certificates and annual corporate reports, he said.

Rollins and Graham said they would examine fees to see if they are appropriate but would prefer tax modernization over imposing any new fees.

“There’s not a lot of sympathy for any new taxes right now,” Rollins said.

“We need to upgrade our tax structure to meet the needs of the 21st century,” Graham said.

House Speaker Greg Stumbo said the tax structure needs to be revised.

“If we were running a business like we run government, we probably would be broke because we don’t re-examine and adapt our revenue sources to the changes in the economy,” Stumbo said.

But House GOP Whip David Floyd of Bardstown said tax reform is “a euphemism for tax increases on certain earners and not others.”

Rollins and Carroll said they would support plans to add video slot machines at horse tracks without a constitutional amendment.

The plan would generate up to $300 million upfront, Carroll said.

However, the plan died last year and a recent special election failed to break the Republican majority in the Senate.

Graham said he would prefer to put the gambling proposal on the ballot.

“I think the people should have a choice,” he said.

The Senate is expected to deal with a proposal that would put the gambling issue in the hands of Kentucky voters.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

 




Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. State-Journal.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
Jump to Page: 1 2 3
   Next 10 Comments of 26 Total Comments
26.
    Posted by sdonnac40601 December 23, 2009
bjos, I have asked many senators, the governor and the lt why so many retired employees back on contract. I have never received an answer. Many say it is to save money. BULL.....they are paying an average $50 an hour to these employeement agencies per contractor, when many of them are only doing clerical work that could be done by someone for $10 per hour.

25.
    Posted by ema December 23, 2009
I saw on the news lot long ago that the free snacks, coffee, sofa drinks, etc. were being eliminated for the legislators. We'll see what happens come January.

24.
    Posted by DISGUSTED_WITH_POLITICIANS December 22, 2009
It's called OPM people. Thats 'other peoples money'. As long as the legislature and high rollers are not held accountable they will continue to rape and rob you and me. They vote themselves raises and better retirement benefits at the midnight hour and don't looose a minutes sleep over it. Common thieves is what they are. And they have enacted laws and rules to protect themselves. We can't stop them. It will have to be one their own to stop them. But like a gang of badmen they will protect each other and continue the raping of the common folks. I guarantee you, they will promote better retirement and raises for themselves while they put the burden on the taxpayer. They are all SCUMBUCKETS. Especially those in charge, Hail to King Williams!! M-Fer!

23.
    Posted by Joshua Owens December 22, 2009
"truth is good" I know firsthand about the Kroger thing. They used to purchase entire pallets of soda and truckloads of snacks. Are they not making enough to buy their own sodas? Why is tax money being used to provide optional refreshments?

22.
    Posted by Need4speed December 20, 2009
Oversight and due diligence from State Government? You gotta be kidding! Har har it is to laugh. I must agree with your wife. The barbeque will become airborne.

21.
    Posted by ronandlane December 20, 2009
I am not an advocate of higher taxes, but I must say that we enjoy one of the lowest sales tax rates in America. Perhaps we need to raise our sales tax to 6.5% or 7%. It means an extra $1.00 for every $100 spent which would translate into quite a bit of extra income for the state. We need our State Workers to be able to continue to do the work they do to keep our state functioning. The money has to come from somewhere. As long as there is a lot of oversight and due diligence on behalf of State Auditors we should be able to monitor the funds and ensure they are spent prudently. (my wife would probably tell me that pigs are flying over our house as well). We have to start somewhere and cannot always remain so cynical.

20.
    Posted by truthisgood December 19, 2009
'P Diddy' I concur.There is no one to hold them accountable.If the KY General Assembly were forced to have the same Insurance and pay increments as State Employees things would be a lot different.

Kentucky General Assembly expenses from Jan. 1, 2007 and mid-August 2009.I have listed a few recipients of our tax dollars better known as the open check book.

COUNCIL OF STATE GOVTS =$495,496 Looks to be almost 100% spent on attending Conferences.

GATEWAY PRESS INC.$151,752.00
COLORING BOOKLET: BEAGLE BOOK = Spent $44,398.00
between APRIL 12, 2007 & APRIL 7, 2009 Yes it says a Beagle Coloring book(let).44K

SENATE POSTERS = $4,044.00

SENATE PARCHTEX CERTIFICATES = $13,282.00 in 13 Months

Unspecified charges to GATEWAY PRESS INC. April 2007 through April 2009. = $61,796.00

Kroger
JANUARY 2007 through AUGUST 3, 2009 = $111,212 Talk about spending it like it is your own money.

Find the entire list at the link below.

http://datacenter.courier-journal.com/expenses/

19.
    Posted by Joshua Owens December 18, 2009
I think this govt needs to be afraid of the people. That's what old Tom Jefferson said. I wouldn't mind cracking a few kneecaps for freedom

18.
    Posted by wapping57 December 18, 2009
I apologize for offending a lot of hard-working state employees. I did not mean to imply that all are slackers. Too many are working too hard to make up for those that don't. I could see having temps for a few weeks at a time during a busy season, but not all 52 weeks a year and for 10 years straight and longer. However, this point is also true. While the state does not pay them benefits, the temp agency gets at least double and sometimes triple what the employee gets paid. That is a industry standard and is not commonly known. It is a statistical fact that what is actually paid by the taxpayers to the temp agency for that employee adds up to more than what the state would pay the employee in benefits, including health insurance and retirement pay. I know a lady who is office manager in one of the temp agencies and she told me that an employee may make eight dollars an hour, but the agency gets twenty dollars. The employee never gets a pay raise, but the agency does. It would be nice if folks who work hard for their salary, be they temp or merit, would be more concerned about the vice going on amongst the higher ups. I see that the disgraced head of the League of Cities is going to get a $13,000 retirement pension from the state and Bob Arnold likewise gets paid until next year along with a state pension for unbelievable greed. What happened to the law about felony theft causing you to forfeit your pension? I won't hold my breath for justice!

17.
    Posted by Tamed-Shrew December 18, 2009
wapping -
Temps are hired for certain positions and kept there so the state doesn't have to pay benefits for them. It has nothing to do with merit employees not wanting to do the work.

Perhaps you are mixing it up with the days when testing was required for most positions, and many who applied could not pass the (very outdated) tests. [I remember taking a test that asked about carriage returns on a typewriter and how to file cards in a card catalog -- well after computers and online catalogs were established in state offices.] Then, the state hired temps because the tests kept away perfectly good applicants.

I worked for state government 10 years as a merit employee in a merit agency. Sure there were those that were slackers, but no more than those I see now in my current workplace. To say that any class of workers (merit, non-merit, contractors) are a lazy waste of money is a hateful generalization. The issue at hand is fairness: by regulating salaries, justification for positions, and coming up with a system of checks and balances that prevent abuse from all levels.

   Next 10 Comments | Home | Back