In the United States of America they first came for the Smokers,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Smoker.
Then they came for the Public Speakers,
and I didn't speak up because I was not an Activist. (I'm an instigator!)
Then they came for the FLDS,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a polygamist.
Then they came for the Firearms,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a shooter or collector.
Then they came for the Newspapers -
and by that time...
(with apologies to Niemller)
Interestingly, the call that instigated the search and seizures at the FLDS compound was apparently a fake! You'd think that meant that everyone and everything would have to be returned, any and all evidence excluded, charges dropped, and someone charged with dereliction of duty (at a minimum) for not verifying the call initially. Aren't "they" required to show "reasonable cause" to get a search warrant? Don't they have caller I.D.: the call from ten miles away supposedly came from another state! But none of that will happen; the Supreme Court has ruled evidence collected in an illegal arrest can still be used for other charges.
So if, angry at Andy J., I call and report that he has a still and, based solely on that anonymous call, "they" search and find none, but, he is arrested on any trumped up charge, (later dismissed for cause)THEN they find a quantity of black powder and minnie-balls for his muskets AND he had BAYONETS on the guns, he can be charged for having bomb-making supplies. Bayonets, after all, are not Politically Correct today.
The FLDS' biggest crime may be just that they are not PC.
Polygamy? NO, thank you. One wife at a time was too many, at least the second one was, should have kept the first. But, have you heard of a Muslim being charged? There are routinely articles in web-news about their multiple marriages. Sex with a teenager? NO, not for well over 30 years.
Still, we, the U.S., allowed a ~12-year-old girl seeking asylum to be returned to her home country to be married against her will because it followed the mores of her ethnic group. After the wedding, remember pictures of her father proudly displaying the bloody sheet from her marriage bed?
Wasn't polygamy outlawed in Utah just because it was a condition of statehood?
Any ancestors that married at 14 or younger?
Who are YOU to say they can't live by century-old traditions? Heard of the Amish or Mennonites?
What happened to the "snake-handlers?"
We have Constitutionally Guaranteed Freedom of Religion.
Unless it is not PC.
Andy, wasn't Rachel technically a polyandrix? Why wasn't she charged and arrested? Oh, that's right. You were "special" and very PC at the time.
Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite.
Inappropriate posts may be removed.
State-Journal.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
Login above or Register to comment.
4 Total Comments
4.
Posted by sickofreadingcrapcomments May 2, 2008
Carter- pick a better cause. You are off your rocker this time. There are easier sells going on. How 'bout that Rev. Wright?
3.
Posted by ema May 1, 2008
The age of consent in the state of Kentucky is 16. It isn't always enforced. Children have a short time to be children. I think it's very wrong to take that from them.
2.
Posted by trying May 1, 2008
"Any ancestors that married at 14 or younger? "
Not they I know off, but I know it used to be done. Still doesn't make it right. We learned from the experience and made laws to prevent this from happening.
I have nothing against their religious believes. If they are happy being polygamous and it works, good for them. I don't care what they practice as long as it doesn't harm the rest of society or children. The latter seems to be the case. There is no way a 14-year-old is ready for marriage, ready for sexual relations, or ready to raise children. It's not right and shouldn't be done.
Now there seems to be evidence of physical abuse. The majority of the boys seem to show evidence of broken bones, not one but several bones per boy. There is definitely more to it than what is known right now.
No matter what their believes, abuse (physical or sexual) is not right. We have laws against that. If they want to live in this great country of ours, they need to obey the rules, and they are subject to prosecution just as much as any other predator.
Copyright Frankfort Publishing Co., LLC 1995-2008. All Rights Reserved.
Content may not be republished without the expressed written consent of the publisher.