Quantcast
Home | Back

Padlocks, I stand corrected!!!!

Email To A Friend
Printer Friendly
Comments
Add to Reddit Add to Digg Add to del.icio.us
June 25, 2009

It is entirely my fault for the opinion on the padlocks. After submitting my first opinion and went back to the homepage, the padlocks mysteriously reappeared. Am I seeing things? Or maybe, not seeing things?






Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. State-Journal.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
 7 Total Comments
7.
    Posted by phillipsonline June 26, 2009
That's okay smartgirl1. I'm the one who felt a little strange here. I was like, well looky here and then I was like..FIGURES....lol

6.
    Posted by smartgirl1 June 26, 2009
Sorry for the double post.

5.
    Posted by smartgirl1 June 26, 2009
Oh, don't feel bad. I have that problem, too. If the main article is locked, I don't think you can see the lock. Other articles on the home page they sometimes don't load. Then of course there are the articles previously unlocked, then locked. Others get eventually unlocked. Weird system.

I doubt it'll get people to subscribe to the full service just because of the locks.

4.
    Posted by smartgirl1 June 26, 2009
Oh, don't feel bad. I have that problem, too. If the main article is locked, I don't think you can see the lock. Other articles on the home page they sometimes don't load. Then of course there are the articles previously unlocked, then locked. Others get eventually unlocked. Weird system.

I doubt it'll get people to subscribe to the full service just because of the locks.

3.
    Posted by Tamed-Shrew June 26, 2009
You're correct -- that's why I posted a story about the same thing: http://www.state-journal.com/news/simple_article/4611889. You never know if a lock (the image) does indeed rep. a "locked" article. They come and go, and sometimes they appear on "unlocked" articles, too.

2.
    Posted by realdeal June 26, 2009
see *them. oops.

1.
    Posted by realdeal June 26, 2009
No, it's been the same here too. Sometimes I see him, other times here lately, I haven't. Just been directed to that same message you posted. Wish they would just make them all viewable!