Home | Back

More Free Money For the FPB

Email To A Friend
Printer Friendly
Comments
Add to Reddit Add to Digg Add to del.icio.us

When I got home today I noticed a flyer in my mailbox. With Thanksgiving approaching my first thoughts were for some upcoming seasonal sales/discounts. Unfortunately this was not the case. The flyer turned out to be a pretty warning notice from the FPB.

You know it's not a good thing when on the front page it states that what is contained will affect "ALL of our cable subscribers". From reading the lengthy 7 page flyer I find out that FPB is making the digital jump in cable. Well that can't be too bad right?

Well as I continued to read I picked up a few facts. The FPB estimates 35,000 analog TV's in it's service area. So the switch to digital will require some extra equipment. That's not that bad because the government was talking about this and offering coupons to get digital converter boxes for your tv. But wait, the federal government has nothing to do with this massive change, "There are no coupons involved" (so forget about getting this for free!), and NO tv will work without a built in QAM tuner or the FPB DTA box.

Now something doesn't sound right. They are making a change that's supposed to be good for the people but instead are offering the same channels in a new format that IS NOT HD! It is a digital signal but not HD quality (that costs extra too!).

So thanks to this seemingly unbeneficial change, we get to pay an extra $1 per month on our bill for the same channels, with no HD, no Digital music channels, no additional Digital channels from their analog package (http://www.fewpb.com/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=7m%2byG4RgeQI%3d&tabid=291), no home theater system hookups, and further limiting the use of VCR's so they can push their DVR's (which if you have one on your PC or another brand may not work if it isn't QAM certified!). What is the rationale behind the FPB expecting ALL of their customers to pay more money and get nothing for it?

The rational is simple, it's the almighty dollar. $1 is all they say per month that their DTA box will cost. While that sounds nice, remember their 35,000 analog TV sets (this doesn't include possible digital TV's that don't have a QAM certified tuner) in Frankfort. That's $35,000 a month, $420,000 a year for a seemingly cheap box!

While I do understand that time and money have been spent to get the system digitally ready, wouldn't it have made sense to build a system that utilizes what's currently available instead of something that might not even be in the nice HD LCD TV you bough from Best Buy 3 years ago? Or if it wasn't possible to do that at least make it worth everyone's while by giving them something extra for the money, not the same channels and sub par service they are already known for!

Please feel free to express your opinions. I'd love to see if I'm the only one that feels this way. But if anyone from FPB does actually read this then maybe a logical explanation could be given!

CAL






Comments
By Posting to this site, you agree to our Terms of Service Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed. State-Journal.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.

Login above or Register to comment.
Jump to Page: 1 2 3 ... 10
   Next 10 Comments of 100 Total Comments
100.
    Posted by pianoman November 26, 2009
Be thankful for the liberties we have today and God will take care of the rest since HE IS IN CONTROL.

99.
    Posted by hillbillyman November 26, 2009
By the way, EMA, we won't have that freedom if our government continues to go in the direction they are going.

98.
    Posted by hillbillyman November 26, 2009
It's too bad that when an individual states their opinion and/or comment, someone has to make a big issue out of it. Let it rest, people.

97.
    Posted by ema November 26, 2009
Let's all give thanks for living in a free society where we can post our opinions.

96.
    Posted by bstacy121 November 25, 2009
Piranha

Thats the thing about posting an opinion, you open yourself up to some that are different from yours. Therefore I don't need your permission to get involved. In this free world I can voice my opinion about anything I want without your permission. You have the right to voice yours and I have the right to either agree or disagree. I spent 20 years defending those rights for you and me.

95.
    Posted by hillbillyman November 25, 2009
Well, who in the world ask you to get involved? All I was doing was stating a comment. Forget it.

94.
    Posted by bstacy121 November 25, 2009
Piranha
Get a grip, when an apology is given, there should be no assumption it will be accepted. Especially if it is thought to be given with a lack of sincerity. Cal said he thought your apology was empty..those are his feelings..even if you don't agree it does not make his feelings wrong. To try and pull the religious factor into it still doesn't mean anyone has to accept your apology. You can condone your actions all you want, but if you thought you were right about what you said or did there would be no reason to condone them. Speak with facts not emotion.

93.
    Posted by hillbillyman November 24, 2009
And EMA, by the way, I feel I did the proper thing by asking forgiveness from the people who read my comments. I feel this is the right thing to do since God says we must ask for forgiveness.

92.
    Posted by hillbillyman November 24, 2009
EMA: I am trying to be nice, but it's rather difficult to be nice to people like you who don't accept apology. All I was doing was explaining to CAL (see his comment below) that in order for God to forgive him for anything, he, CAL, would have to forgive me for acting the way I did. All I did was ask for forgiveness for the way I behaved in an earlier time. I am not angry.

91.
    Posted by ema November 24, 2009
Piranha, why are you so angry?

   Next 10 Comments |