|
||||||||||||
|
News Sections
Citizen Journalism
Marketplace
The State Journal
Newspaper Subscriptions |
Home |
Back
Details emerge in day care shutdownJune 23, 2007
Photo By Suzanne Feliciano
Robin Tracy appeared in Franklin County Circuit Court Friday afternoon. Robin Tracy, left, her daughter, center, and husband spoke with Tracy's attorney, Willie Peale Jr., following a hearing Friday in circuit court where Tracy agreed to close her home-based childcare after complaints were filed by the Cabinet for Health and Family Services Division of Regulated Child Care. Videos:
More details surrounding the local childcare provider - accused in legal documents of hiding children from inspectors - are emerging following an order Friday shutting down the facility. Just before 2 p.m. Friday Franklin Circuit Judge Thomas D. Wingate accepted an order closing Robin Tracy's in-home day care as an official business. Tracy can now care for no more than three children, but that operation is not licensed or sanctioned by the state and will function along the lines of babysitting. The State Journal obtained records from the Cabinet for Health and Family Services Office of the Inspector General Friday afternoon detailing the allegations that Tracy, operator of Ms. Robin's Childcare, 225 Meadowview Drive, illegally operated a day care. In addition to hiding nine children - ages one to six years old - in a crawlspace under her porch, allegations listed in the records include: >March 7 Tracy sent a letter to the state saying she would not be providing care in her home. On March 13 Tracy sent another letter explaining why she was not closed " the same day inspectors found an additional two children enrolled in Tracy's care, placing her over the limit of children she could legally care for. Tracy explained the switch by saying parents were depending on her to care for their children. >March 16 Tracy was not home when a child was dropped off at her facility by a school bus. Records say, "The provider was aware that all of the parents had not been notified of the home being closed and contacted the parent after the child had already been left at the home (40 minutes later)." >Records say inspectors also found a 16-year-old supervising children alone and more than six children under the age of six at the day care. Tracy arrived in court Friday wearing a white button-up blouse and floral print skirt. Her curly blonde hair was held back by a white headband. Before the judge entered the courtroom, Tracy along with several people her attorney identified as family and friends, took pictures and verbally bullied State Journal reporters and photographers. Her attorney, Willie Peale Jr., took her into a private conference before Wingate took the bench.
Peale told The State Journal Tracy was not admitting to any violations by accepting the order and he questioned the accuracy of some of the information filed by the state. Court documents say on Monday two inspectors from the state visited Ms. Robin's Childcare and found nine children ages one to six hidden in a crawlspace under the back porch of Tracy's home with Tracy's 16-year-old daughter telling the children "to be quiet." Three other children " two toddlers and an infant " were found in the house also, court documents say. Tracy voluntarily gave up her certification in April and could no longer provide childcare to more than three children unrelated to her. "That number could be a combination of related versus unrelated," Peale said. He also questioned the validity of the state's inspections. "They made this raw sweeping general allegation," he said. "From the information I have received, she is a wonderful (childcare) provider." Robert Hester, director for Division of Regulated Childcare for the Cabinet said he was pleased with the outcome. "I think it's exactly what we wanted. All we wanted was for an illegal daycare to close," Hester said.
Comments
Please note by clicking on "Post" you acknowledge that you have read the
Terms of Service
and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed.
State-Journal.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
Next 10 Comments
Posted by sickofreadingcrapcomments August 27, 2007
Home childcare facilities are probably the least facilities in need of regulation!The big ones, ran as a business are outrageous and all sorts of stuff goes on there that isn't the way parents would like and they still are allowed to operate. And with rules cutting them more slack. The previous post is right about 12 kids to one in daycares, I would add that big centers can have tons of kids in one room together as long as there are enough adults to provide the ratio and you may actually have only one of those adults doing all the work and kids running around like mass chaos. Its hard to find good employees for the amount you pay a childcare provider and it becomes just a numbers game.
In a home daycare, at least the people doing the caring all have a greater vested intrest and i would imagine that a 16 year old daughter (as long as there is an adult provider around to oversee,) CAN do the job very well. For god's sake most everyone hires teens to babysit in our home with NO adult supervision, from time to time. Just this week someone inquired about my thirteen year old babysitting their Two-week-old infant(I said no because my daughter has not had much experience with babies that young,and perhaps it would be okay for her if the child was three or four at least.) Lets not be so pious as parents. Consider the time you actually spend focused on your kids. In home Child care providers and some other providers are actually spending more time than we do sitting on the floor looking at our kids and interacting with them. In fairness they can, because it's their job and they can just relax into it unlike parents who have alot of other crap to focus on, but nonetheless..cut em some slack. I haven't heard anything that this woman did wrong other than have too many, and too many is relative, when you consider what is going on in facilities. You can handle this number of kids and consider for a moment that just because the state, city, federal govt. make laws and regulations does not mean that those laws and regs are needed, appropriate or don't do more harm than good frequently. Thats why they themselves are changing them all the time.
Posted by hothead June 29, 2007
Well, I stand by it, she is greedy. She finds herself in court again for non-compliance. Good heart, yeah sure. Those kids were not playing hide and seek. They all hide in the same spot??? I guess bb you have to find a new sitter, LOL!
Posted by Generous George June 29, 2007
I think the kids were playing Hide-n-seek and were told to "be quiet" (per a previous post) in order to remain hidden. Regardless if state inspectors arrive on site, the game still continues. So, if this is the "real" scenario, then it was, and still is, okay to hide and remain silent from anybody, and especially the "seeker" of the game. It's okay, in my opinion, for a baby-sitter to allow a fun game of hide-n-seek to take place during regular scheduled working hours; however, it is not legal, according to KRS 1985.3233.323810.84219 to allow such activities to take place on the premises of that location after working hours. If the inspectors joined and participated in the game, the game must then end and a new game must begin (the inspectors may not hide from the seeker with the hiders) and it is an unsaid rule that one of the new participating members must first be a seeker before he or she is allowed to be a hider.
Posted by bb June 28, 2007
i love the comments from people who dont know the real situation. she never had her 16 year old daughter watching those kids alone. just because the paper assumed these things doesn't mean that it was true. she had workers that worked with her on certain days. there was no proof that the children were even hiding. it is all based on what one persons opinion was. i think with as many children that daycares are allowed with one teacher that private sitters should have the same regulations. i know that at a daycare i have been assigned to watch 12 kids or more by myself so what makes it any different in someones home. she just has to good of a heart to turn people away when she is needed. there are not good daycares out there or if they are good they don't have any openings. then what are parents suppose to do.
Posted by paulquire June 26, 2007
Linda Moore - I have more respect for you than you know. If you would like to learn why, my email is paulquire@yahoo.com.
Posted by lindamoore318 June 26, 2007
Paul Quire - Wow - such anger directed toward me! I simply made an observation about including a fashion show in stories about people appearing in court. I personally didn't see the purpose (If you would read the other posts, I wasn't alone). I enjoy the State Journal and read it daily even though I don't live in Frankfort anymore. It's a wonderful way to keep up with my many friends and family members. As for my mental well-being, I am touched that you cared enough to give your advice, however, I'm enjoying life more than ever! Have a great day!
Posted by hothead June 26, 2007
I don't care how caring and qualified she is, when she is around the kids. She sometimes left them in the care of her child. A 16 year old taking care of 12 kids in the appropriate manner..., yeah, give me a break! She knew she was not allowed to have that many kids in her home and she took them anyway. Why else would they have been hiding? The law is there to safeguard the kids. I would like to know the reason why she handed in her license besides that she wanted to persue other work. She was checked up on so frequently for a reason. And after handing in her license she knew better and took the kids anyway. Maybe she thought that nobody would check up on her, if she is not officially registered with a license. Money-hungry, that's what I think!
Posted by paulquire June 25, 2007
lindamoore318 is there any story in the State Journal you would stamp with your approval. Are you a retired English teacher with nothing to do but complain about everything. You should enjoy life while you are still alive, you don't want to die an old miserable woman.
Posted by bb June 25, 2007
this woman is a good babysitter regardless of how many kids that she has. as long as there aren't any abuse charges leave the woman alone.
Posted by Countrie June 25, 2007
I found it just as ammusing with Sara's "Fashion Report". What purpose is it to inform us of the what they are wearing. Personally I think Ms. Gividen has been watching too much "Entertainment Tonight". Does she do this on all her stories???
Next 10 Comments Login above or Register to comment. |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||