Where do we meddle next?

By Michael Kinsley Published:

By Michael Kinsley

So, after more than a half-century of active meddling protecting our interests, promoting our values, encouraging democracy, fighting terrorism, seeking stability, defending human rights, pushing peace its come to this. In Iraq we find ourselves unwilling regents of a society splitting into a gangland of warring militias and death squads, with our side (labeled the government) outperforming the other side (labeled the terrorists) in both the quantity and gruesome quality of its daily atrocities. In Iran, an irrational government that hates us with special passion is closer to getting the bomb than Iraq the country we went to war with to keep from getting the bomb ever was.

And in Afghanistan site of the Iraq war prequel that actually followed the script (invade, topple brutal regime, wipe out terrorists, establish democracy, accept grateful thanks, get out) the good guys we put in power came close a couple of weeks ago to executing a man for the crime of converting to Christianity. Meanwhile, the bad guys (the Taliban and al-Qaida) keep a low news profile by concentrating on killing children and other Afghan civilians rather than too many American soldiers.

When the United States should use its military strength to achieve worthy goals abroad is an important question. But based on this record, it seems a bit theoretical. A more pressing question is: Cant anyone here play this game?

Half a century ago, Iran was very close to a real democracy. It had an elected legislature, called the majlis, and it had a repressive monarch, called the shah, and power veered uncertainly between them. In 1951, over the shahs objections, the majlis voted in a man named Mohammad Mosaddeq as prime minister. His big issue was nationalizing the oil companies.

But in 1952 the United States had an election for president, and the winner (Dwight Eisenhower) got more votes than anyone in Iran. That must explain why in 1953, in the spirit of democracy, the CIA instigated a riot and then staged a coup. Mosaddeq was arrested, the majlis was ultimately dissolved and the shah ran things his way, which involved torture and death for political opponents, caviar and champagne for an international cast of hangers-on, and no more crazy talk about nationalizing the oil companies.

But, speaking of crazy talk, resentment of the shah and of the United States was central to the growing appeal of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. In 1979 the ayatollahs followers overthrew the shah and made Iran a strict Islamic state. Later that year Iranian students besieged the U.S. Embassy and seized 66 hostages, most of whom were held prisoner for over a year. Hatred of Iran in America became almost as fierce as hatred of America in Iran.

Meanwhile, next door in Iraq, an ambitious young dictator, new to the job, named Saddam Hussein sensed both danger and opportunity in Irans chaos. So he decided to invade. Thus started the Iran-Iraq War, lasting eight years. It turned hundreds of thousands of people into corpses and millions into refugees. When it was over, nothing had changed. But it wasnt a complete waste. It provided another opportunity for the United States to promote its interests and values.

On the enemy of my enemy principle, the United States all but officially backed Iraq. We overlooked Saddams use of chemical weapons against Iranian soldiers (many of them children) and against his own people. Many of the human rights abuses President Bush and others have invoked two decades later to justify the decision to topple and try Saddam were well publicized in the 1980s. But in the 1980s, we didnt care. Meanwhile, of course, Ronald Reagan was also secretly selling weapons to Iran.

The big event in Afghanistan this past half-century was the Soviet occupation of 1979. After the occupation, some of the deposed thugs and others formed militias that roamed the countryside killing people and whatnot. These were called guerrillas, because we were for them. During the 1980s, we spent hundreds of millions of dollars a year on weapons and other support.

The war we sustained in Afghanistan destroyed the country, turned half the population into refugees and killed perhaps a million people. In 1989 the Soviets pulled out. But, disappointingly, our guerrillas kept on fighting using our weapons against the government and among themselves. In 1996 one particularly extreme group, the Taliban, took power. It was even more disappointing when the Taliban established an Islamic state more extreme than the one in Iran and invited Osama bin Laden to make himself at home, which he did.

So we marched in and got rid of the Taliban. Then we marched into Iraq and got rid of Saddam Hussein. Now were well, we havent figured out what, but were hopping mad and gonna do something, dammit, about Iran.

And they lived happily ever after.

Special to The Washington Post

Want to leave your comments?

Sign in or Register to comment.