An open-records case led to rare agreement Friday between the Kentucky Democratic Party and the state's Republican attorney general, Daniel Cameron, in a legal dispute fraught with undertones related to next year’s governor’s race.
Cameron's office concluded that the state Department of Agriculture violated Kentucky's open records law by failing to respond to a request for records from the Democratic Party. The decision involved likely opponents in the 2023 race for governor — which already has threatened to overshadow this year's U.S. Senate and congressional contests.
Kentucky Attorney General Daniel Cameron
The agriculture department is run by Agriculture Commissioner Ryan Quarles, who formally entered the race for governor this week. His campaign rivals include Cameron, who filed paperwork last month signaling his bid for governor in what's shaping up as a crowded GOP primary for the state's top political job. The Democratic Party is a frequent critic of Quarles and Cameron, both of whom want to unseat Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear.
On Friday, at least, Democrats were trumpeting the open-records decision by Cameron's office. They made no mention of their obvious interest in a contentious Republican gubernatorial primary, which could benefit Beshear when he encounters the winner in a general election bid for a second term.
The agriculture department said Friday night that it does not intend to appeal the ruling, and a Quarles spokesman said the Democrats' pursuit of information was politically motivated, “confirming" that the agriculture commissioner “is their greatest threat” in 2023.
Ryan Quarles
The case stems from a request for records sought by Democrats related to litigation involving Quarles or the agriculture department. The request, which sought emails and text messages generated or sent on government-owned email accounts and cellphones as well as those on non-government email accounts and cellphones, was made by state Democratic Party executive director Sebastian Kitchen.
His initial request was made in February. The agriculture department said it would not provide records protected by attorney-client privilege. It asked that Kitchen clarify which litigation he was referring to in his request. Kitchen refused and submitted a new request April 20.
The Democratic executive sought emails and text messages related to any litigation involving the department during Quarles' tenure as agriculture commissioner. The department did not respond to the follow-up request, and the Democratic Party appealed to the attorney general's office.
The AG's decision, dated Thursday, said the department violated the state's open records law by failing to respond to the April 20 request for records. The ruling also said the department did not commit a violation when it sought clarification of the initial February request.
The Democratic Party responded with a news release touting the AG's opinion and slamming Quarles. The release said Cameron “agreed” with the party that the agriculture department had violated the open records law.
“The public has a right to know how Ryan Quarles is spending their tax dollars and why he’s in court," Kitchen said in a follow-up statement.
Offering a starkly different assessment, the agriculture department said the AG's decision showed that “politically motivated cronies can't file vague, imprecise and baseless requests.”
Under state law, opinions issued by the attorney general on open-records and open-meetings issues carry the weight of law unless appealed in circuit court.
Post a comment as
Report
Watch this discussion.
(1) comment
Why does Quarle’s think he’s Governor material? He spearheaded a “ thought “ that has cost the farmers in Ky multi$ million’s in losses in his and Mitch McConnell’s farce about CBD oil from Hemp, Marijuana, dope , maryjane,weed , wacky tobacky or whatever you want to call it . Many Farmers lost their savings investments. Others are still paying for expensive “ equipment “ even though the growers market is defunct. But good ol’ boys Quarle’s and McConnell are still getting their steady income - they didn’t lose one red cent , while watching these farmers go broke with this “ new “cash crop, Quarle’s falsely proclaimed about . Talking about the “blind leading the blind!” I’m surprised the press hasn’t uncovered this and brought it to light to the public, what really happened. A relative of mine grew some and was told he wouldn’t get paid for two years ! That would be a good project for the SJ staff , although many farmers are likely “ embarrassed “ about it , instead of angry , in a dysfunctional relationship with the Ag Commission Quarle’s . Its like a physically or mentally abused small child , abused by a parent , that runs back to the same parent for “ dysfunctional “ comfort, because the child has no one else to go to. It’s a Republican thing.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
State-Journal.com’s comments forum is for civil, constructive dialogue about news topics in our community, state, nation and world. We emphasize “civil” at a time when Americans, in the words of the current president, need to “turn down the temperature” of political debates. The State Journal will do its part by more carefully policing this forum. Here are some rules that all commenters must agree to follow:
Absolutely no attacks on other commenters, on guest columnists or on authors of letters to the editor. Our print and online opinion pages are sacred marketplaces of ideas where diverse viewpoints are welcome without fear of retribution. You may constructively critique the ideas and opinions of others, but name-calling, stereotyping and similar attacks are strictly prohibited.
Leeway will be given for criticism of elected officials and other public figures, but civility is essential. If you focus your criticism on ideas, opinions and viewpoints, you will be less likely to run afoul of our commenting rules.
Keep comments focused on the article or commentary in question. Don’t use an article about the Frankfort City Commission, for example, to rant about national politics.
Hyperpartisanship that suggests anyone on the other side of an issue or anyone in a particular particular party is evil is not welcome. If you believe that all Democrats are socialists intent on destroying America or that all Republicans are racists, there are lots of places on the internet for you to espouse those views. State-Journal.com is not one.
No sophomoric banter. This isn’t a third-grade classroom but rather a place for serious consumers of news to offer their reactions and opinions on news stories and published commentary.
No consumer complaints about individual businesses. If you’ve had a bad experience with a private business or organization, contact the Better Business Bureau or the government agency that regulates that business. If you believe the actions of a private business are newsworthy, contact us at news@state-journal.com and we will consider whether news coverage is merited.
Absolutely no jokes or comments about a person’s physical appearance.
No promotion of commercial goods or services. Our outstanding staff of marketing consultants stands ready to help businesses with effective advertising solutions.
If you state facts that have not been previously reported by The State Journal, be sure to include the source of your information.
No attacks on State Journal staff members or contributing writers. We welcome questions about, and criticism of, our news stories and commentary but not of the writers who work tirelessly to keep their community informed. Corrections of inaccurate information in news stories should be sent to news@state-journal.com rather than posted in the comments section.