I am a 26-year-old woman and a lifelong resident of the Commonwealth of Kentucky. I have attended private, religious, and public schools here, and I’ve worked, worshiped and volunteered here.
But most importantly, I am a transgender person who has received gender-affirming care here.
I am living proof that gender-affirming care is genuinely lifesaving. I would not be here today to tell my story without it. The anti-trans laws currently making their way through the Kentucky legislature are not rooted in science or the lived experiences of the people they would impact. If gender-affirming care is outlawed in Kentucky, it would have a truly devastating effect for children, adolescents, and families across Kentucky.
Emma Curtis
I remember telling my mother when I was four years old that I wanted to dress up as Jessie from "Toy Story 2" for Halloween, and I remember how dejected I felt when she told me that I couldn’t go as Jessie, because Jessie was a girl and I was a boy.
I remember praying every Sunday in church for God to allow me to be seen as the girl He and I both knew I was, only to be devastated every Monday when I woke up and my prayers had not been answered.
I remember the intense, all-encompassing depression I experienced during puberty, and the fear I felt when I looked in the mirror and saw my changing body. Even now, it’s difficult for me to think or speak about how traumatizing it was to watch my body develop male secondary sex characteristics like body hair, broad shoulders, and masculine facial features. I wanted to literally crawl out of my skin.
I know now that I was experiencing gender dysphoria, a deep sense of distress at the incongruence between my gender identity and the gender I was assigned at birth.
Some of the changes my body went through during puberty are permanent; others I have spent many years and thousands of dollars trying to reverse. It is heartbreaking to know that this damage to my body could have been prevented had my mother, doctors and mental healthcare providers been aware of gender-affirming care.
When I first heard the word “transgender” as a teenager, I felt two things: relief that there was a word for the type of person I am, and dread knowing would happen when I told my friends and family that I am transgender.
It took me three years to build up the courage to transition. While many of those closest to me were supportive, I also experienced negativity and harassment as a visible trans woman in public and at my school, which led me to do something that lawmakers are currently hyper-focused on: I detransitioned.
I didn’t detransition because I felt over-medicalized or was coerced into transitioning, as many lawmakers would have you believe. I detransitioned because I wasn’t ready for the vulnerability, harassment, and hate I faced as a visible trans woman in the world.
That experience isn’t unique to me. Studies like the 2015 US Transgender Survey show that a very small minority of people who receive gender-affirming care choose to detransition (around 8%), and that most people who do say it was external factors — like poor social supports and negative reactions from others — that led them to detransition, not their own discomfort. Of that 8%, 62% re-transition.
Those numbers certainly reflect my experience. A year or so after detransitioning and living as male again, I did something over 80% of trans people consider: I attempted suicide. By the grace of God, I did not succeed.
Let me make this very clear: it was not gender-affirming care that led me to attempt suicide, but the fear that there would never be a world where I am accepted, loved, and valued as a member of my community.
After my suicide attempt, I transitioned again, and never looked back. Six years later, I can firmly say that gender-affirming care literally saved my life.
I have heard many people in the public and political spheres speak as if estrogen and testosterone are being handed out to children like Halloween candy. They also say genital surgeries are being performed on children, that gender-affirming care is experimental, and the majority of those who receive it end up regretting it.
All of these claims are false.
Accessing gender-affirming care, even as an adult, is extremely difficult in Kentucky. I was met with bureaucratic obstacles, years-long waitlists, extensive mental health screenings, and a shortage of providers who are trained and authorized to provide this care.
That’s partly because there are already extremely strict standards of gender-affirming care from a non-partisan medical organization called the World Professional Association for Transgender Health. WPATH’s standards of care have been adopted by nearly every single major medical organization in the world, including the American Medical Association and the Kentucky Medical Association.
WPATH differentiates between children and adolescents. They recommend social support and mental healthcare for children, recommend against genital surgeries of any kind for minors, and recommend reversible medical interventions, like puberty blockers and hormone therapy, for older adolescents only.
I have no doubt that legislation codifying WPATH guidelines would be met with support from the trans community. None of the anti-trans bills currently moving through the Kentucky legislature are reflective of the reality of how gender-affirming care is administered, and are explicitly against what research has shown to be the most effective ways of treating gender dysphoria.
Lawmakers are weaponizing transgender kids to further deepen partisan differences. Many people in this country see people like me as boogeymen attempting to invade their homes, communities, and schools to force genital surgeries and so-called “gender ideology” on children. The reality is that we are people who just want to survive. We deserve the same access to happiness and self-determination as anyone else.
If Kentucky’s current anti-trans bills become law, the message to every transgender child and adolescent in Kentucky is: “You do not belong here. We refuse to see you, accept you, or value you. You are an error that must be corrected.”
Despite evidence to the contrary, I continue to hold on to hope that Kentucky lawmakers will not be that cruel.
Emma Curtis is a filmmaker, activist, and transgender Kentuckian. She grew up on her family's farm in Woodford County before graduating from Centre College in 2018. She currently works as an independent filmmaker and resides in Lexington with her girlfriend and her dog. She can be emailed through Angela Cooper atangela@aclu-ky.org
I have not read the bill; therefore, it is impossible to comment on the discussion of what it does and doesn't do. However, I was under the impression that it was intended to keep a minor from doing harm to themselves due to immaturity or a mentally over-disappointed parent urging a sex change for their child. It would be the individual's decisions a few years later in life
State-Journal.com’s comments forum is for civil, constructive dialogue about news topics in our community, state, nation and world. We emphasize “civil” at a time when Americans, in the words of the current president, need to “turn down the temperature” of political debates. The State Journal will do its part by more carefully policing this forum. Here are some rules that all commenters must agree to follow:
Absolutely no attacks on other commenters, on guest columnists or on authors of letters to the editor. Our print and online opinion pages are sacred marketplaces of ideas where diverse viewpoints are welcome without fear of retribution. You may constructively critique the ideas and opinions of others, but name-calling, stereotyping and similar attacks are strictly prohibited.
Leeway will be given for criticism of elected officials and other public figures, but civility is essential. If you focus your criticism on ideas, opinions and viewpoints, you will be less likely to run afoul of our commenting rules.
Keep comments focused on the article or commentary in question. Don’t use an article about the Frankfort City Commission, for example, to rant about national politics.
Hyperpartisanship that suggests anyone on the other side of an issue or anyone in a particular particular party is evil is not welcome. If you believe that all Democrats are socialists intent on destroying America or that all Republicans are racists, there are lots of places on the internet for you to espouse those views. State-Journal.com is not one.
No sophomoric banter. This isn’t a third-grade classroom but rather a place for serious consumers of news to offer their reactions and opinions on news stories and published commentary.
No consumer complaints about individual businesses. If you’ve had a bad experience with a private business or organization, contact the Better Business Bureau or the government agency that regulates that business. If you believe the actions of a private business are newsworthy, contact us at news@state-journal.com and we will consider whether news coverage is merited.
Absolutely no jokes or comments about a person’s physical appearance.
No promotion of commercial goods or services. Our outstanding staff of marketing consultants stands ready to help businesses with effective advertising solutions.
If you state facts that have not been previously reported by The State Journal, be sure to include the source of your information.
No attacks on State Journal staff members or contributing writers. We welcome questions about, and criticism of, our news stories and commentary but not of the writers who work tirelessly to keep their community informed. Corrections of inaccurate information in news stories should be sent to news@state-journal.com rather than posted in the comments section.
Post a comment as anonymous
Report
Watch this discussion.
(2) comments
I have not read the bill; therefore, it is impossible to comment on the discussion of what it does and doesn't do. However, I was under the impression that it was intended to keep a minor from doing harm to themselves due to immaturity or a mentally over-disappointed parent urging a sex change for their child. It would be the individual's decisions a few years later in life
Emma certainly appears to be honest! I can’t say that about the GOP Ky Legislators can I?
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
State-Journal.com’s comments forum is for civil, constructive dialogue about news topics in our community, state, nation and world. We emphasize “civil” at a time when Americans, in the words of the current president, need to “turn down the temperature” of political debates. The State Journal will do its part by more carefully policing this forum. Here are some rules that all commenters must agree to follow:
Absolutely no attacks on other commenters, on guest columnists or on authors of letters to the editor. Our print and online opinion pages are sacred marketplaces of ideas where diverse viewpoints are welcome without fear of retribution. You may constructively critique the ideas and opinions of others, but name-calling, stereotyping and similar attacks are strictly prohibited.
Leeway will be given for criticism of elected officials and other public figures, but civility is essential. If you focus your criticism on ideas, opinions and viewpoints, you will be less likely to run afoul of our commenting rules.
Keep comments focused on the article or commentary in question. Don’t use an article about the Frankfort City Commission, for example, to rant about national politics.
Hyperpartisanship that suggests anyone on the other side of an issue or anyone in a particular particular party is evil is not welcome. If you believe that all Democrats are socialists intent on destroying America or that all Republicans are racists, there are lots of places on the internet for you to espouse those views. State-Journal.com is not one.
No sophomoric banter. This isn’t a third-grade classroom but rather a place for serious consumers of news to offer their reactions and opinions on news stories and published commentary.
No consumer complaints about individual businesses. If you’ve had a bad experience with a private business or organization, contact the Better Business Bureau or the government agency that regulates that business. If you believe the actions of a private business are newsworthy, contact us at news@state-journal.com and we will consider whether news coverage is merited.
Absolutely no jokes or comments about a person’s physical appearance.
No promotion of commercial goods or services. Our outstanding staff of marketing consultants stands ready to help businesses with effective advertising solutions.
If you state facts that have not been previously reported by The State Journal, be sure to include the source of your information.
No attacks on State Journal staff members or contributing writers. We welcome questions about, and criticism of, our news stories and commentary but not of the writers who work tirelessly to keep their community informed. Corrections of inaccurate information in news stories should be sent to news@state-journal.com rather than posted in the comments section.