If you’ve gone grocery shopping in Kentucky lately, you saw prices in every aisle that were likely the highest you’ve ever seen. For those of us raising kids, summer is compounding that as we’re buying food for meals that our kids had been getting in school.
One or both of those factors — higher prices and greater need — have probably led to some jarringly high bottom lines on your last few grocery receipts. It’s likely that your household food budget has rarely been stretched thinner.

Dustin Pugel
For the 543,429 Kentuckians getting help with groceries through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) in May, the terrible reality of having to pay higher prices for a longer list of necessities was made worse by a third powerful threat to their well-being.
Last month, Kentucky’s SNAP participants, 12.1% of the state’s population, got an average of about $100 less in grocery money per person than what they had been receiving since April 2020. But that’s just the average — others like seniors and working folks who have income near but below the poverty level lost up to $230 per month.
It didn’t have to be this way, and in most other states it’s not. But the 2022 Kentucky General Assembly chose to end our state of emergency related to COVID-19 (a requirement for the extra SNAP benefits) when it passed Senate Joint Resolution (SJR) 150, and then doubled down on that choice when they overrode the governor’s veto.
This extra grocery money (known as emergency allotments or “EAs”) was worth roughly $50 million per month in Kentucky. These EAs were conditional on the federal declaration of a Public Health Emergency as well as a state-level emergency declaration related to COVID-19. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services will keep the federal declaration in place until at least November of this year, which means that because of SJR 150, Kentucky will lose out on the extra SNAP funding from May to November — roughly $350 million.
Meanwhile, food prices are rising nearly 10% on an annual basis.
But for Kentucky’s children, the picture gets far worse. At the same time that SNAP benefits are being cut, kids have also lost free school meals.
During the summer of 2020 and 2021, a special federal waiver allowed schools to provide meals for students while school was out. The parents of hundreds of thousands of kids could swing by their school building and pick up enough lunches to cover the week — reducing hunger and helping alleviate some of the strain on family budgets. But those waivers are set to expire at the end of this month, and many schools chose not to participate because of the administrative difficulty of providing meals for only half the summer. And when kids go back to school in the fall, the old rules about free and reduced lunches means only those who apply, or who are lucky enough to be in a universal free or reduced lunch school, will be able to pick up a lunch at the cafeteria cost-free.
Summer’s usual worsening of food insecurity and hunger, combined with this moment’s unusually inflated prices for food and other necessities, would have caused more hardship in families and communities across Kentucky no matter what.
Unfortunately, state and federal policies are morphing Kentuckians’ double dose of economic pain into a triple threat — not only higher prices and greater need, but also less help to weather those hits.
We can do better. For starters, instead of putting up barriers to food assistance, the General Assembly should work to make it easy for all eligible Kentuckians to get and keep adequate help with groceries. The “Benefits Cliff Task Force” meeting this interim must keep Kentuckians’ well-being as their focus. Federally, as Congress debates the new four-year Farm Bill, they should act on the lessons learned from the groundbreaking pandemic-era food programs. That would mean making things like free school meals, summer support, and enhanced SNAP benefits a permanent fixture in our anti-hunger toolbox. The last two years have been a proof-of-concept for how effective these programs are at fighting hunger and supporting working families.
Without evidence-based policies to keep food on the table, the triple threat families are experiencing this summer will cause us to fall backward into greater hunger in the commonwealth. Let’s do better.
Dustin Pugel is senior policy analyst for the Kentucky Center for Economic Policy. He can be emailed through Alan Lowhorn at alan@kypolicy.org
Post a comment as
Report
Watch this discussion.
(5) comments
OMG, you have to apply for free lunch in order to get a free lunch. That is despicable
Something wrong wit a needy child getting a free lunch?
The article was talking about kids not automatically getting free lunch and having to apply for it. Is it so bad to have families that need help just ask for it? Or should everyone get everything for free just because?
And stop voting Republican! They are heartless, cruel and do not have your best interests at heart!
Last time I saw the super majority Republican Ky law makers ,it fully appeared that those old white guys have never , ever skipped a meal in their lives. They don’t want to protect kids from gun violence and now want them to go hungry - at the same time they are forcing unwanted pregnancies, so more children are born??????????????????????????????
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
State-Journal.com’s comments forum is for civil, constructive dialogue about news topics in our community, state, nation and world. We emphasize “civil” at a time when Americans, in the words of the current president, need to “turn down the temperature” of political debates. The State Journal will do its part by more carefully policing this forum. Here are some rules that all commenters must agree to follow:
Absolutely no attacks on other commenters, on guest columnists or on authors of letters to the editor. Our print and online opinion pages are sacred marketplaces of ideas where diverse viewpoints are welcome without fear of retribution. You may constructively critique the ideas and opinions of others, but name-calling, stereotyping and similar attacks are strictly prohibited.
Leeway will be given for criticism of elected officials and other public figures, but civility is essential. If you focus your criticism on ideas, opinions and viewpoints, you will be less likely to run afoul of our commenting rules.
Keep comments focused on the article or commentary in question. Don’t use an article about the Frankfort City Commission, for example, to rant about national politics.
Hyperpartisanship that suggests anyone on the other side of an issue or anyone in a particular particular party is evil is not welcome. If you believe that all Democrats are socialists intent on destroying America or that all Republicans are racists, there are lots of places on the internet for you to espouse those views. State-Journal.com is not one.
No sophomoric banter. This isn’t a third-grade classroom but rather a place for serious consumers of news to offer their reactions and opinions on news stories and published commentary.
No consumer complaints about individual businesses. If you’ve had a bad experience with a private business or organization, contact the Better Business Bureau or the government agency that regulates that business. If you believe the actions of a private business are newsworthy, contact us at news@state-journal.com and we will consider whether news coverage is merited.
Absolutely no jokes or comments about a person’s physical appearance.
No promotion of commercial goods or services. Our outstanding staff of marketing consultants stands ready to help businesses with effective advertising solutions.
If you state facts that have not been previously reported by The State Journal, be sure to include the source of your information.
No attacks on State Journal staff members or contributing writers. We welcome questions about, and criticism of, our news stories and commentary but not of the writers who work tirelessly to keep their community informed. Corrections of inaccurate information in news stories should be sent to news@state-journal.com rather than posted in the comments section.